If we're going all or nothing, I'd rather see an outright ban on attractants, minerals, food plots etc than have corn pile wars between neighbors. Personally, I think there is some type of happy medium to be had and, realistically, we are probably already near that happy medium. Nevertheless, the baiting crowd will not be happy until there is legal baiting and would rather see food plots banned out of spite than admit there is some kind of reasonable middle ground to be had.
Baiting is really an odd cause to be passionate about. I mean, really? A person can be so passionate about a pile of corn that they would see food plots banned purely out of spite? I can understand how a person could be passionate about deer dogging and would seek to change the law in Tennessee to make hounding for deer legal because they are passionate about hunting dogs. That makes sense to me. A freakin' pile of corn, though? That's stupid and the actions of the staunch pro baiting crowd are nothing short of childish. I've noticed that almost all staunch pro baiting arguments are presented as attacks on other variants of supplemental feeding rather than presented as tenable arguments unto themselves. There are weaker ways to present an argument, but it is still pretty weak.