What is wrong with baiting deer on public land?

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

Should baiting deer be allowed on public hunting land?

  • Yes

    Votes: 9 7.8%
  • Mineral and salt licks only

    Votes: 11 9.5%
  • No

    Votes: 86 74.1%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 10 8.6%

  • Total voters
    116

Doskil

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Messages
1,618
City & State/Province
NC USA
The other thread was about private land.

So why exclude public/WMA land from baiting?
 
So why exclude public/WMA land from baiting?
I'm opposed to killing wildlife over bait piles,
regardless whether public or private lands.

The wildlife belongs to the public, so if pulling wildlife to a specific spot for the purpose of killing it is made legal on private lands, then it becomes even more important that it's also legal on public lands.


Again, the wildlife belongs to the public, and the public's wildlife should not be allowed to be unfairly claimed by any private land owner. We are all free to hunt on both our private & public lands, but the playing field should be level for all, regardless.

It's totally different if we're talking about farm animals on private lands. Those animals belong to the landowner. Free-roaming deer (or turkeys or birds or whatever) are considered "wild" and to belong to everyone, not whoever's property they happen to fly or walk across.

As to the deer on my private property at any moment, the neighboring hunters on public land can make at least an equally valid claim that those deer belong to them? And it would be unfair if I were allowed to herd them off public to then kill them off "my" private land?

Since deer typically freely roam over somewhere between several hundred and several thousand acres, should a person who owns 15 acres be able to claim ownership to those deer, while the adjoining thousand acres (perhaps with over a dozen different owners) is also hunting those same free-roaming deer?

Should a person owning 15 acres be given the legal right to spotlight & kill those deer at night, if all the other adjoining landowners are not allowed to do the same? Why should killing deer over bait be any different?
 
0557801C-8327-49CC-8DAB-CCA816349ECD.jpeg
 
Sometimes, an issue can be better weighed if we just put the shoe on the other foot?

What if the question had been,
should we allow killing deer over bait piles on public lands, but not on private lands?

Many the same private land hunters pushing for legalizing baiting on private lands would suddenly be opposed to such baiting on public lands?
Why the double-standard?

But does it really matter whether your bordering lands are public or just everyone else's private?

Even if you privately own over a thousand acres, the deer, spending some of their time on your property, mostly belong to other people besides yourself.
 
I'm opposed to killing wildlife over bait piles,
regardless whether public or private lands.

The wildlife belongs to the public, so if pulling wildlife to a specific spot for the purpose of killing it is made legal on private lands, then it becomes even more important that it's also legal on public lands.


Again, the wildlife belongs to the public, and the public's wildlife should not be allowed to be unfairly claimed by any private land owner. We are all free to hunt on both our private & public lands, but the playing field should be level for all, regardless.

It's totally different if we're talking about farm animals on private lands. Those animals belong to the landowner. Free-roaming deer (or turkeys or birds or whatever) are considered "wild" and to belong to everyone, not whoever's property they happen to fly or walk across.

As to the deer on my private property at any moment, the neighboring hunters on public land can make at least an equally valid claim that those deer belong to them? And it would be unfair if I were allowed to herd them off public to then kill them off "my" private land?

Since deer typically freely roam over somewhere between several hundred and several thousand acres, should a person who owns 15 acres be able to claim ownership to those deer, while the adjoining thousand acres (perhaps with over a dozen different owners) is also hunting those same free-roaming deer?

Should a person owning 15 acres be given the legal right to spotlight & kill those deer at night, if all the other adjoining landowners are not allowed to do the same? Why should killing deer over bait be any different?
The question this thread asked was both relevant and valid, and that's why right there. ^
 

Latest posts

Back
Top