That ones been making the rounds for years now....PillsburyDoughboy":2rxno6oj said:This one is making the FB rounds reported to be in the Williamsburg KY area
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bigtex":5fjdv8dy said:That ones been making the rounds for years now....PillsburyDoughboy":5fjdv8dy said:This one is making the FB rounds reported to be in the Williamsburg KY area
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mathews338":10r18as2 said:It hasn't been that long ago, less than a year, that a ton of people on this very site would make stupid comments about Cougars being in this state. Wonder what think now?
That is a leopard.PillsburyDoughboy":30zxlxl9 said:This one is making the FB rounds reported to be in the Williamsburg KY area
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Until recently, I would have agreed with you.BamaProud":3j7fyn81 said:I maintain that there is no established population in the state...and that there is no evidence that we are any closer to having one.
TheLBLman":r82cpeoq said:There is now a recent East TN photo floating around, supposedly of a cougar.
If it's not photo shopped, and if indeed from where stated, it appears to be an older cougar kitten, adding relevance to my last post above. The picture made the local news and is supposedly being taken seriously in terms of attempts to authenticate that it's not photo shopped, and/or not from another state.
Here's the story from the local Knoxville news . . . . . .
http://www.local8now.com/news/local/hea ... 68511.html
I don't think one would, assuming he migrated here of his own accord and had grown up truly "wild".Biggun4214":2wep2iu1 said:With the undeveloped lands in Sevier County and surrounding areas (GSMNP and Cherokee National Forest) why would a wild cougar be frequently seen in a subdivision?
When I posted that "wink and a nod" comment, I was actually thinking more in terms of an "appropriate" federal agency, such as, but not limited to, the park service, with TWRA possibly being kept totally in the dark regarding. Keep in mind anything is possible, and the rule of law seems to mean little within some federal bureaucracies. Also, if such might be happening, I would doubt if anyone other than the very top echelon within said bureaucracy would be aware.scn":1m53fh8z said:No, a federal agency would not be allowed to do this with a wink and a nod from TWRA.
I agree it is premature to label some of the suspicious findings as "evidence". Let's just say it's extremely suspicious when a FEMALE cougar of Dakota origin (along with numerous males) suddenly appear en masse scattering across Tennessee, WITHOUT any increase in sightings in Illinois, Indiana, much less Kentucky.scn":1m53fh8z said:I've been told that there have been private groups illegally releasing cougars in the US. The info I was given several years ago was that it was primarily in the northeast. There has been zero evidence of anything along those lines going on in TN.
I agree that it may very well be a photo-shopped pic of a bobcat. But apparently, TWRA wasn't able to quickly conclude that to be the case. Still waiting to hear what the photo "experts" have to say. In the meantime, assuming it to be genuine, it would appear more as an older kitten than an adult cougar.scn":1m53fh8z said:The ETN cat, imo, is a badly photo-shopped picture of a bobcat. I have zero confidence that it represents a wild cougar.
Dag-nabbit! I just spit coffee all over my keyboard! :mrgreen:Biggun4214":2rxf9rf6 said:A former officer saw an elephant walking down the road near Kodak . . . .
And deer and turkey and cows and any anything else on a farm.treefarmer":2y1zcwn0 said:There is a photo of the Humphreys County cougar 3/4 mile from our property. I think it's great. I doubt I'll ever see one but just knowing they are out there makes it more exciting to be in the woods. Their territory is so large (13,000-50,000 ac) it won't have a big impact on any one property. They also eat wild hog and coyotes.