redblood":3nlpdley said:owners rights. I live in a dead end road on a big farm in a unit L county where the deer population is as high as anywhere in the state, I would wager. I see 40-60 deer out my window every morn and afternoon. I shot one doe all year, on the last afternoon just for meat. 20 deer in the field with her, not a one ran at the shot. The farmer who farms mine also farms the 1500 acres that surrounds me. I will not let him depredate on my land. I understand you can have too many deer, but I enjoy watching them. I think land owners have to trump
cecil30-30":1pz9pn5j said:What about the farmer/landowners who complain about deer bit refuse to let anyone Hunt their place.
Deer Assassin":5fl7o793 said:cecil30-30":5fl7o793 said:What about the farmer/landowners who complain about deer bit refuse to let anyone Hunt their place.
most farmers dont want people to hunt their farm
they want people that will kill deer not sit and wait on a big buck
Bone Collector":217tinc0 said:Deer Assassin":217tinc0 said:cecil30-30":217tinc0 said:What about the farmer/landowners who complain about deer bit refuse to let anyone Hunt their place.
most farmers dont want people to hunt their farm
they want people that will kill deer not sit and wait on a big buck
This^^^ and they don't trust anyone they don't know to do it in most cases.
I don't think the population of deer in most areas is enough to really hurt the farmers as bad as people think. some one that puts out a small garden could see a lot of damage but a farmer with 500 plus acres of crops in most areas is not gonna see enough damage to matter much.Doskil":1hfcuutj said:to put up with "high" deer populations so hunters have lots of deer to hunt?
Mike Belt":58uttgo2 said:I don't know if it's possible but it would seem to me that in these instances the farmer would want some kind of assurance that 1) there would be enough deer removed to substantially reduce crop loss and 2)some type of guarantee against damages of the property. Maybe there needs to be regional organizations sponsoring groups of hunters that are seeking hunting areas that can be held accountable for both. There are farmers now that won't allow hunting; free or leased hunting. If they had responsible representatives and were able to make extra money for doing so by leasing they may be willing to change their mind.
Doskil":25l2v4jo said:to put up with "high" deer populations so hunters have lots of deer to hunt?
MUP":3ms8afit said:Doskil":3ms8afit said:to put up with "high" deer populations so hunters have lots of deer to hunt?
I don't think farmers and landowners should be "forced" to do anything that they do not want to. This sounds like another govt intervention program in the works.