MS opens tomorrow right?

Spurhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
15,479
Location
Munford, TN
My son and my cousin are hunting different tracts in MS this morning. My cousin said they gobbled their brains out this morning, but across the road where he can't hunt. My son heard a couple birds on public land that joins the private he's hunting, but non-residents can't hunt public yet. Maybe something turns up for them as the day goes on.
 

Southern Sportsman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
3,399
Location
West TN
Now there's a thought!
Maybe TN should do something like this on state-owned public lands?
1st week for residents only?

Not suggesting this on federally owned lands like LBL or Ft. Campbell.
MS implemented this when nearly all surrounding states (GA, AL, TN, AR) pushed their seasons back. MS wanted to keep their 3/15 start date, but there would have been a HUGE influx of out-of-staters like us pounding their public land. With our delayed opener, I don't think this type of limitation is necessary, but I absolutely agree that MS had to do this or delay their season.
 

Spurhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
15,479
Location
Munford, TN
MS implemented this when nearly all surrounding states (GA, AL, TN, AR) pushed their seasons back. MS wanted to keep their 3/15 start date, but there would have been a HUGE influx of out-of-staters like us pounding their public land. With our delayed opener, I don't think this type of limitation is necessary, but I absolutely agree that MS had to do this or delay their season.
Other than South Florida, Mississippi has the earliest opener in the country. You are correct, had MS not implemented this rule they would've been HAMMERED with out of staters.
 

megalomaniac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
14,805
Location
Mississippi
I don't see how MS is getting away with keeping non-residents off of National Forests and Corp of Engineer land for 2 weeks. Are those not federally funded and paid for by all of us?
Same way every single state out west does it, but the states out west are FAR more restrictive than MS

MS only limits NR 1st 2 weeks, and only on public land. The NR public land quota is 1000 permits (which are free). They came up with that number, because that was the estimated number of NRs coming in just before covid hit and the travelling turkey hunter explosion.

Again, private land is wide open to nonresidents without limitations as well as all open public lands after the first 2 weeks without limitations.

The change wasn't made to exclude nonresidents, it was made so that those who drew the NR permit would have a better experience hunting public. Without the 1000 NR permit limitation, you would be lucky to find a tree to sit on that didn't have a hunter on it already.
 

Spurhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
15,479
Location
Munford, TN
Same way every single state out west does it, but the states out west are FAR more restrictive than MS

MS only limits NR 1st 2 weeks, and only on public land. The NR public land quota is 1000 permits (which are free). They came up with that number, because that was the estimated number of NRs coming in just before covid hit and the travelling turkey hunter explosion.

Again, private land is wide open to nonresidents without limitations as well as all open public lands after the first 2 weeks without limitations.

The change wasn't made to exclude nonresidents, it was made so that those who drew the NR permit would have a better experience hunting public. Without the 1000 NR permit limitation, you would be lucky to find a tree to sit on that didn't have a hunter on it already.
I get all that, but you didn't answer my question. How can a state tell non-residents that they can't hunt federal land that everybody pays for? I get that they can do whatever they want on state owned WMAs, but I'm talking about federal land. I don't really have a dog in the fight. I have numerous private tracts in MS I can hunt and I don't hunt public land anyway, but I just don't see the logic.
 

megalomaniac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
14,805
Location
Mississippi
I agree... but its been a longstanding precedent that the huntable animals within a state belong to the state, NOT the federal govt, and as such can be managed however a state sees fit (even on federal land within the state). Anyone can come and hike, camp, birdwatch, whatever on federal lands, but you cannot kill an animal that belongs to the state unless the state authorizes it.
 

knightrider

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
10,811
Location
tn
I get all that, but you didn't answer my question. How can a state tell non-residents that they can't hunt federal land that everybody pays for? I get that they can do whatever they want on state owned WMAs, but I'm talking about federal land. I don't really have a dog in the fight. I have numerous private tracts in MS I can hunt and I don't hunt public land anyway, but I just don't see the logic.
Because the federal lands go by state statue in most areas
 

Spurhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
15,479
Location
Munford, TN
I agree... but its been a longstanding precedent that the huntable animals within a state belong to the state, NOT the federal govt, and as such can be managed however a state sees fit (even on federal land within the state). Anyone can come and hike, camp, birdwatch, whatever on federal lands, but you cannot kill an animal that belongs to the state unless the state authorizes it.
You explained it perfectly. It makes sense but I'm not sure I agree with it.

Now I'm wondering if the state of MS could ban non-resident fishermen from fishing at Sardis (a Corp of Engineers lake) in April during the crappie spawn because the ramps are too crowded if they took a notion.
 

Latest posts

Top