I agree. If it was legal. I just find his whole story suspect. I mean why go on a podcast and tell this big long sketchy story? "On his sisters 30 acres" that turns out to only be 8 acres with no woods on it at all? Recovered the deer at 1030 the following morning, but no pictures during the daylight? Not a chance a buck like that gets recovered at 1030 and no pictures taken until dark. There is one daylight photo of the deer laying by itself in what appears to be woods, which his sisters property has none of again… m lol
I just had a hard time believing him after he went on that podcast. How he went into so much detail on every aspect of it other than the actually hunt. Forgot his phone, flashlight etc. I'm not law enforcement, but I am public service(fire). So I have seen my share of people being dishonest. It just seemed off to me from the get go.
I hope for the sake of the magnificent animal that it was legal, but I don't have a good feeling about this one.