IA-No gun hunting during the rut, no centerfire rifles.
I hunt a lot in alabama and also in tennessee and have wondered why in alabama you dont have to check in deer and turkey. but this year they have chenged it, you have to check deer in, like you do in Tn. but you also have to fill out a harvest record that you have to have with you at all times while hunting.soshock1 said:I hunt mainly in TN but also hunt with some family in AL. AL does NOTHING better than TN when it comes to deer hunting. Say what you will about how we have to check in the deer in TN, AL has no check system and their deer harvest data is just some guy's best guess. Not really what you were asking but my two cents anyway.
Poser said:TN's rules regrading a deer hunters entrance to the woods in relationship to first light on public land is absolute garbage. It's not enough time to adequately penetrate the woods and get setup before first light, much less shooting light. Even on the quota hunts they let you enter the WMA's before stated time. I say ditch that reg -it is not only useless, it is unenforceable,disregarded across the board, it is (potebtially) inhibitive of hardcore hunting. -a small, but overlooked reality of public land deer hunting.
TLRanger said:Kentucky - TELECHECK
Recoil said:Since I'm from Missouri and have family there, I enjoy going there and hunting as a nonresident with it's four points on one side restriction--which gives you many more opportunities to shoot a much nicer "average" buck than middle Tennessee affords.
At the same time, many areas of MO have habitat not as good as many areas of TN, and the effects of the hunting regulations on herd health cannot be ignored.BSK said:Just remember MO is always going to produce much better bucks of the same age as TN does. Just a matter of habitat quality.
stik said:BSK said:stik will kill me for saying this, but I kind of like GA's buck limits--2 per year but one has to have 4 points on one side. I think this is a good compromise between all hunter wants and needs.
leave it at 3 bucks with restrictions on the 3rd would be tolerable. otherwise NO ANTLER RESTRICTIONS!!!
Wes Parrish said:At the same time, many areas of MO have habitat not as good as many areas of TN, and the effects of the hunting regulations on herd health cannot be ignored.BSK said:Just remember MO is always going to produce much better bucks of the same age as TN does. Just a matter of habitat quality.
On that we agree.BSK said:But the majority of MO has habitat superior to the majority of TN.
EastTNHunter said:stik said:BSK said:stik will kill me for saying this, but I kind of like GA's buck limits--2 per year but one has to have 4 points on one side. I think this is a good compromise between all hunter wants and needs.
leave it at 3 bucks with restrictions on the 3rd would be tolerable. otherwise NO ANTLER RESTRICTIONS!!!
Agree 100%!
Yep I went on a hunt in bama once and got to use it. Very deadly inside 40 yards! Kinda like rabbit hunting only bigger :grin:rukiddin? said:Master Chief said:timberjack86 said:Buckshot!
Why? I never really understood why you would use it even if it was legal. A rifle or slug seems so much more practical.
If you ever shoot one inside 40yds with a load of 1B's, you'll see why!!!
kldeerkiller said:1 buck limit and shorter gun and muzzleloader seasons.
Wes Parrish said:IMO, going to a simple 2-buck limit would improve Tennessee's top-end antler results more than the antler restrictions currently being used by any state.