Mature buck per acre?

Grnwing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
622
Location
West TN
The thread about skill vs land quality brought up many great points about not being able to kill what's not there. I have been trying to find studies or data that would give an idea of how many mature (4.5+) bucks are on a section(640 ac) of land. What are your thoughts on mature bucks/acre?
 

fairchaser

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
8,883
Location
TN, USA
This is what I've read in some QDM journals. Calculate deer per square mile, then use your buck/doe ratio to determine how many bucks you have. Use 25% of the buck population to determine mature bucks 3.5 years and older. This will vary depending on where you are in the season.
 

woodsman04

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2018
Messages
878
Location
Alabama
Several years ago, maybe just a few I don't remember, there was a very good discussion/debate on this question. BSK was very involved in it.
Don't remember what BSK said number wise exactly, but all I remember that it was pretty low.

I rarely get trail cam pictures of older bucks on my personal private small farm, but what keeps me going is BSK saying that bucks move so much during the breeding season that you can't just go off what you have per square mile.

I get very few photos and kill/see even less, but knowing in the back of my mind you never know when one will be around keeps me after it. Usually one or two days out of the year I will get a picture of a roaming buck or actually see one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Grnwing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
622
Location
West TN
[quoteThis is what I've read in some QDM journals. Calculate deer per square mile, then use your buck/doe ratio to determine how many bucks you have. Use 25% of the buck population to determine mature bucks 3.5 years and older. This will vary depending on where you are in the season.][/quote]

I have read and looked at some of those articles and found them helpful. I used data provided from a private club and was surprised at what the numbers showed. It really shows the importance of sex ratios in the expression of a more balanced age group in the buck population. Having too many does in the herd reduces the number of bucks further reducing the amount of opportunity a buck will have at growing older, while forcing higher doe kills to maintain the current ratios. I won't go in depth, but just look at a deer density of 20 deer/ sq mile and adjust your sex ratio from 5:1 down to 2:1. You can quickly see how few bucks are in the herd compared to does, but when those numbers get more balanced you see the number of bucks increase further increasing the likely hood that may make it another year closer to maturity.

Several years ago, maybe just a few I don't remember, there was a very good discussion/debate on this question. BSK was very involved in it.
Don't remember what BSK said number wise exactly, but all I remember that it was pretty low.

I wish he still posted on here, he is one of the members that I thought may have some answers.
 

TX300mag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
13,641
Location
Crosby, TX
Same here. And multiply the number using by 3 or 4 during the rut as ranges expand and change.

We've gotten so reliant on cameras that many think a deer doesn't exist if he hasn't walked in front of their camera recently.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

megalomaniac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
14,804
Location
Mississippi
I would guess if you averaged TN as a whole it would be around 1 per Sq mile (640ac). Lots of pockets with none, lots of pockets with 10 per Sq mile. All I know is the number of mature bucks has exploded in the past 4 years or so. 10 years ago, I bet there were less than half as many as the state now carries

Sent from my SCH-R970X using Tapatalk
 

th88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Messages
441
megalomaniac":39pcn9yo said:
I would guess if you averaged TN as a whole it would be around 1 per Sq mile (640ac).
That is a good general rule to go by. Adjust according to quality of area.
 

Latest posts

Top