I don't know that I agree totally with you on this one Mega. I completely understand your reasoning, and I know I never want to waste an animal, but what happens when you have a anti hunter neighbor for instance? Not everyone has the means to own or hunt large tracts of land. I don't think that a hardworking person, who has purchased their land, which is more than likely a smaller parcel, should be forced to not hunt their land because of the neighbors disposition. Do I think that just because I am a hunter and the neighbor might not be that I have a right to trespass on their land just to retrieve my deer? No I don't. The anti hunter worked and paid for his land the same as the hunter who shot the deer. I believe that most people, like yourself, are willing to allow the retrieval of a deer if it is done the right way. However there will always be someone who stands on the opposite side of the isle from you and I think that's just part of life. I'm also not a fan of government interference in civil aspects so I'm hesitant to even suggest a change to our laws. I do know that there are other states who allow retrieval of game across boundary lines regardless of having permission from the landowner. I have no experience in these states that allow this but I would be interested to hear from hunters and landowners to get their take on how well that has or has not worked.