Woo Hoo All SEC Championship

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

BamaProud":1u9apu96 said:
Bama versus Georgia.
Saban versus Smart.
Should be a great Game

Who ya got?

Kirby said it . They played horribly and sloppily !

If they play that way against ALABAMA they are going to get chewed up .

ALABAMA!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I've already said it several times, but I have 0 confidence in my DAWGS in this game. Not saying that they won't try or play hard, but I think that they have a few too many chinks in their armor...
 
ALABAMA Defense will shut down their running game and force the pass . I see lots of points on D for ALABAMA in this game .

38-3 feels about right !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
e2b0fab1c34b9a00cc9ea67409c50cdd.jpg


21-14 DAWGS


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
After watching both of the games yesterday, I think GA has a much better QB than Clemson, and much better running backs. I think Bama has the best defense in college football, but I still see a close game. I think a mistake or two will decide this one.

Bama in a close game.
 
Kinda sucks, I don't know for sure what day it is on but I figure it will be a Monday or Tuesday and won't be over till way past my bedtime.

Didn't get to see them play chumpson and I hate to miss an all SEC championship game but I know I will.

Guess I can record it and TRY to not hear who won till I get home the next day.
 
RUGER":2z7md7gv said:
Kinda sucks, I don't know for sure what day it is on but I figure it will be a Monday or Tuesday and won't be over till way past my bedtime.

The game is slated for 7:00 central, so hopefully kickoff will be by 7:10 or so. It won't be as bad as last night (8:00 kickoff).
 
PalsPal":2q4j3twq said:
RUGER":2q4j3twq said:
Kinda sucks, I don't know for sure what day it is on but I figure it will be a Monday or Tuesday and won't be over till way past my bedtime.

The game is slated for 7:00 central, so hopefully kickoff will be by 7:10 or so. It won't be as bad as last night (8:00 kickoff).

Wow, that's awesome right there. :)
 
scn":18eg4bvq said:
After watching both of the games yesterday, I think GA has a much better QB than Clemson, and much better running backs. I think Bama has the best defense in college football, but I still see a close game. I think a mistake or two will decide this one.

Bama in a close game.


Yep.... Would not surprise me one bit if UGA wins. They have the talent and if their defense plays like they did in the 2nd half of the OK game, it should be a very interesting game.

Bama (Hurst) has to make throws when he is suppose to or Kirby will blitz him to death. Clemson could have made it a lot tougher game if they hadn't thrown the pick 6 and come away with a FG right out of the second half.

Bama 34
UGA 27
 
None of you would be surprised to hear that I don't like it. It's not good for college football.

That said, congratulations to the University of Alabama and the University of Georgia. The two best teams in the playoff made it to the championship round. I would like to see Georgia win it, but regardless I do think we'll have a FBS champion with staff and players with class this year and that is good for college football.
 
Fromm is cool and calm for a freshman but after Alabamas defense pile drives, spears, stone cold stuns, and skull drags him he will be shell shocked and UGA will have to put it all on Chubb and Michel. Against any other defense, that would probably be Ok but Bama can stop the run also.

Here is Fromm about mid 2nd qtr.

giphy.gif
 
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:
 
BamaProud":3cj4361o said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.

Hahahaha
 
BamaProud":hr54tzb0 said:
Another tidbit worth pointing out is that Auburn is going to have to watch its 2 biggest rivals, who they beat, play for the National Championship. ...that's gotta suck.

Too bad, so sad: RTR.
 
nitro_z17":7vgu733a said:
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:

Well, Paul Finebaum might be walking on cloud nine today, but his employer's parent company isn't.

As I've said before, next season is the fifth of the five year CFP agreement. Let me get this out of the way first, Bama and UGA are both most deserving and also the top two teams in college football this year. I like taking an extreme stance from time to time, mostly because it's fun and I'm probably the only non-SEC fan left around here. Heck, maybe it wasn't Bama who shouldn't have gotten in, but Clemson. :rotf: Last night showed the Committee got it wrong ranking William's team #1. :smash: Still, Ohio State can't let an Iowa lay 55 on them, but had Iowa won 20-17 would it have been different? Probably not.

In any event, with two SEC teams playing for the championship and the Big Ten's bowl performance, and to a lesser extent an undefeated UCF beating Auburn who beat both Bama and UGA, next year is probably the last for the four team format. Add onto that the inconsistency of the Committee's decisions (2014 it was a "13th data point"; 2015 it was strength of schedule; 2016 the 13th data point doesn't matter if you've got quality wins on your side; 2017 the "eye test" matters not data). A four team playoff is probably better than an eight team playoff, but the current "playoff" really isn't a playoff. It's an invitational. An eight team playoff could end up being better in reality. Because the four team format requires a committee of humans to select participants (as opposed to using a rules-based system that generates auto-qualifiers and limits the human element to at-large participants and seeding), the corrosive tendencies of the human factor are always at risk at smothering out the good structural aspects of a four team format. At a certain point, the eight team format becomes less imperfect than the four team format. An eight team format also better accommodates two teams from the same conference.
 
RUGER":i35vosm8 said:
Kinda sucks, I don't know for sure what day it is on but I figure it will be a Monday or Tuesday and won't be over till way past my bedtime.

Didn't get to see them play chumpson and I hate to miss an all SEC championship game but I know I will.

Guess I can record it and TRY to not hear who won till I get home the next day.

it is more likely you will see bigfoot Tuesday morning than making it till first break at work without somebody telling you who won,,
 
mr.big":3p0xstnn said:
it is more likely you will see bigfoot Tuesday morning than making it till first break at work without somebody telling you who won,,

LOL you're probably right. :D
 
Scioto":qa3a9gh4 said:
nitro_z17":qa3a9gh4 said:
whats funny is the CFP was made because of the 2011 lsu/bama (all sec) national championship game, and here we are :rotf: :rotf:

Well, Paul Finebaum might be walking on cloud nine today, but his employer's parent company isn't.

As I've said before, next season is the fifth of the five year CFP agreement. Let me get this out of the way first, Bama and UGA are both most deserving and also the top two teams in college football this year. I like taking an extreme stance from time to time, mostly because it's fun and I'm probably the only non-SEC fan left around here. Heck, maybe it wasn't Bama who shouldn't have gotten in, but Clemson. :rotf: Last night showed the Committee got it wrong ranking William's team #1. :smash: Still, Ohio State can't let an Iowa lay 55 on them, but had Iowa won 20-17 would it have been different? Probably not.

In any event, with two SEC teams playing for the championship and the Big Ten's bowl performance, and to a lesser extent an undefeated UCF beating Auburn who beat both Bama and UGA, next year is probably the last for the four team format. Add onto that the inconsistency of the Committee's decisions (2014 it was a "13th data point"; 2015 it was strength of schedule; 2016 the 13th data point doesn't matter if you've got quality wins on your side; 2017 the "eye test" matters not data). A four team playoff is probably better than an eight team playoff, but the current "playoff" really isn't a playoff. It's an invitational. An eight team playoff could end up being better in reality. Because the four team format requires a committee of humans to select participants (as opposed to using a rules-based system that generates auto-qualifiers and limits the human element to at-large participants and seeding), the corrosive tendencies of the human factor are always at risk at smothering out the good structural aspects of a four team format. At a certain point, the eight team format becomes less imperfect than the four team format. An eight team format also better accommodates two teams from the same conference.
:rotf: :tu:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top