deerhunter10
Well-Known Member
Just saw where Kansas banned trail cameras on public land. Cellular and conventional cameras. Very interesting.
Same here. For private, however, they better keep their scratchers off!!I can certainly see that for public land.
I can see it to. Thought it was interesting. I do believe more cell camera bans will be coming in the next 2 or 3 years.I can certainly see that for public land.
Hope TN does the same, but good luck enforcing that law. Nothing more aggravating to me than a bunch of trail cams on public where I hunt. Most hunters around here think they can claim areas just because they run cameras in that area. Then they name the bucks and get mad because you killed "their" buck that they have been getting pics of for the last 3 yrs. LOL.........
After 45 miles hiked on public land past 3 weeks, I'm being selfish.... ive seen 3 cell cams, multiple ladder stands, and a baitpile for turkeys on public. Again, just me being selfish, but if it's public, others should have to put the same sweat equity into their season as me. Sure, I could afford to buy 20 cell cams and blanket the national forest ... but doesn't that cheapen the whole experience?I agree. Although i feel for public land hunters who wont have access to these tools
And I'll bet that is EXACTLY why they are being banned on public land.Hope TN does the same, but good luck enforcing that law. Nothing more aggravating to me than a bunch of trail cams on public where I hunt. Most hunters around here think they can claim areas just because they run cameras in that area. Then they name the bucks and get mad because you killed "their" buck that they have been getting pics of for the last 3 yrs. LOL.........
Thats the reason I pack my stand in and out each day. For one, I don't want to take a chance on a mature buck smelling or spooking because of my stand hanging at the base of the tree. Second, I don't want someone messing with my stand. I usually don't have much company the areas I hunt anyway.That's why I wish it would apply to everything. If you carry it in, then carry it out. Anything left unattended is litter. Then nobody can claim any spot they're not actively sitting in. We wouldn't have to have any more arguments about cameras & tree stands on public ground.
Why should they be banned on private land.Them new fangled ones that alert you immediately when something is around should be banned everywhere.
@rem270
I believe you missed some sarcasm.Why should they be banned on private land.
Ooops lolI believe you missed some sarcasm.
Yeah that was an inside joke.Why should they be banned on private land.
I don't have any private land to hunt so I hunt public. I also have a trail cam on public and enjoy watching the pictures I get. If someone hunts the area I'm watching oh well. That's the breaks. It's not my land. I just hope I get a chance too. Good luck yawl.Hope TN does the same, but good luck enforcing that law. Nothing more aggravating to me than a bunch of trail cams on public where I hunt. Most hunters around here think they can claim areas just because they run cameras in that area. Then they name the bucks and get mad because you killed "their" buck that they have been getting pics of for the last 3 yrs. LOL.........
Finders keepersI've been pretty outspoken and think that anything left on public property is trash. I probably wouldn't have that big of an issue with it if they would require trail cams on public property to be clearly marked on the exterior with the owners identity. If its unmarked, finders keepers. It's required for treestands and I find them all the time and have yet to find one that has a TWRA ID written on it.
Finders keepersif you didnt buy it its stealing
Not in my eyes. It's they TWRA makes it a requirement to have your identification on it, and they owner doesn't, it's just picking up trash. There has to be a way to be able to identify what's supposed to be there and what is abandoned property.Finders keepersif you didnt buy it its stealing