Team Browning said:
The way I see it you have to range it anyway so I dont see it making an incredible difference. That said - it's neat. Thats about it.
This Nikon Omega Scope is "overrated" IMO.
Nothing wrong with it, but for the same or less money, you can get a better scope with the same reticle feature.
The Burris Fullfield II is better optics (95% light transmission --- comparable to the Nikon
Monarch), and can be purchased with the Burris Ballistic Plex reticle (comes with a calibration sheet for many black powder combinations) for less money than the
Nikon Omega (92% light transmission rating).
I wouldn't say the Burris Fullfield II is a better scope than the Nikon Monarch, but it is better than the Nikon Omega. That said, if I already had an Omega mounted on a muzzleloader, I probably wouldn't switch to a Burris, but if you haven't bought yet . . . . . take a look.
http://www.burrisoptics.com/fullfield.html
Better scope, similar reticle, lower price . . . .
http://www.burrisoptics.com/reticles.html