TNDeerGuy
Well-Known Member
I hate when trophyists mask their agenda by going under the guise of QDM! 
TNDeerGuy said:I hate when trophyists mask their agenda by going under the guise of QDM!![]()
bowriter said:"It is riduclous to close the season"...The old Coach said.
Then he said, "Nowadays you are lucky to see any deer in that area."
Has he been learning something from our President.
Remember Coach, we are talking about one area, not the entire state. It is an area where..."Nowadays you are lucky to see any deer in that area."
bowriter said:"It is riduclous to close the season"...The old Coach said.
Then he said, "Nowadays you are lucky to see any deer in that area."
Has he been learning something from our President.
Remember Coach, we are talking about one area, not the entire state. It is an area where..."Nowadays you are lucky to see any deer in that area."
BSK said:I feel for both sides in the situation. You have a high density of hunters hunting a low-density deer herd. How can you ever get age structure into the buck population when there aren't enough living bucks to go around even with a 1 buck limit?
Personally, I do not like to see QDM legislated. It should be voluntary. However, I think enough evidence exists that having older bucks in the population is good for the deer herd that producing older bucks is a part of the state's job. Now, how to do that without restricting hunters too much?
In my personal preference, I would prefer seeing a lottery draw for buck tags before I would want to see antler restrictions.