^^^^Gross.
tn24":beqzkp8l said:Are the scores listed with the pics gross or net?
tn24":1ysagn8v said:fairchaser did the buck in your avatar come off of Ames? Man he looks like a giant!
He is a giant. The mass looks incredible. Beautiful mount. Congratulations,fairchaser":3dnxi5np said:tn24":3dnxi5np said:fairchaser did the buck in your avatar come off of Ames? Man he looks like a giant!
I wish! No, I was blessed to get him in Alberta Canada in 2000. That pic in the avatar was taken at the spot when I first walked up on him. That moment when we finally realize a dream, I will always remember. I never went back. I didn't think I could experience anything better.
Mudbone":l0idegdt said:^^^^
Wow!!
That's a monster!!
Is that a bow kill? What does a deer like that score?
Great job! I've heard u sit all day in Canada. That must be some tough hunting.
Andy S.":39bx6jd8 said:The best part about this particular, at least in my eyes, was he had about 3-4" of brow tines, so that alone should tell you how good everything else was and how great of a "frame" the deer had. If I had my rathers, I would have been fine with him losing the brows and grossing 143" as a mainframe 6 point. How many of those have you seen, much less killed, in your lifetime?TheLBLman":39bx6jd8 said:THAT would be a heck of a rack!Andy S.":39bx6jd8 said:. . . . . a 147" 8 point best to date.
Here is the buck for reference:
2017 Kill pics:
2017 trail cam pics:
2016 trail cam pic. taken in December:
Gotcha, great buck for sure. anything over 24" is getting where you want to be! Gona have to score this one and see what we got!Andy S.":3n37k3mv said:Pretty sure his MBs were 26" and some change.
Andy S.":qv738zxd said:Generally speaking, in my eyes, yes that can be true. I am probably in the minority here, but the number of points means nothing to me when it comes to bucks I target.TheLBLman":qv738zxd said:Andy!
Are you saying an 8-pointer is a "better" rack than a 10-pointer? :shock:
Generally speaking, if the gross score, say 140", were to remain the same for an 8 point, a 10 point and a 12 point, I would rather kill the 8 point. I can promise you the 140" 8 point will more times than not have a better frame (width and height), longer beams, longer tines, better spread, and better mass measurements IF all of the above bucks had a gross score of 140".
Now if you want to wish for the stars, yes, I'd rather the buck have EVERYTHING including numbers of points, but that is so unrealistic in fair chase hunting, that I do not even set myself up for failure by believing a buck of that caliber will walk by me. I am not pessimistic, just realistic in the fair chase world.