3 bird limit???

deerfever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,852
Location
USA
Can someone post that study again about the delayed opener and breeding success?
Go to season changes thread, very first post. I would post again if I knew how. Lol, here is a summary.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240326-104115.png
    Screenshot_20240326-104115.png
    69.1 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:

deerhunter10

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
4,876
Location
maury county tn
I would assume they lost license sales and also the complaining that some people have done. Honestly they never even gave it a chance at all.
Out law decoys of all kinds out law killing Jake's outlaw any kind of fall seasons. I don't agree or understand going 2 to 3 for the limit either. I know a pile of people that tagged out every year when it was 4. Honestly with the way twra is going now we won't have to worry about turkeys in 10 or 15 years.
 

TheLBLman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Messages
38,115
Location
Knoxville-Dover-Union City, TN
Show me the data delaying season by 2 weeks last year hurt hunting success. I'm all ears.
There is no data showing this.
In fact, much of the "data" is flawed and misinterpreted.

The main reason more turkeys were killed last year is because nesting success had been above average the prior year (or two). That was just "luck". We had more turkeys last year, and we have more this year, for a combination of factors & luck.

The solution is not to go back to what was not working.

To those concerned about male decoys, the only effective way to reduce their effective use is by delaying the season opening. Even if made illegal, male decoys would be used by those wanting to use them, with less repercussion than those currently killing turkeys over bait.

The delayed season opening also reduces the attraction of illegal baiting.
 

Setterman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
5,042
Location
Knoxville, TN
One thing that's been obvious for decades is the way our seasons are set. There is no adjusting to actual bird population fluctuations rather idiotic knee jerk reg changes with no real scientific basis. Couple of bad hatches in a row, lower the limit. Giant hatches like the last two, bump it up.

Instead twra in its brilliance left a large limit when we had multiple hatch failures in a row and the results showed.

The people tasked with managing our resources couldn't manage a lemonade stand in their own front yard
 

Iglow

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Messages
2,408
Location
Occupied Tennessee
I don't know where the preoccupation with killing comes from. Isn't 2 enough? Turkey hunting is as close as there is to catch and release in hunting, isn't the whole thing with turkey hunting calling a bird into shotgun range? Or … is it really about the social media pics and being able to say you tagged out to anybody that will listen?
 

paboom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
225
Location
Tennessee
To what data are you referring?
Here is one of the many.


Google is your friend.
 

Southern Sportsman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
3,399
Location
West TN
There is no data at all to show a delay helps but there is a study and data that disproves the theory that a delayed season helps any with reproductive benefits. It has been posted here several times, hundreds of collared hens involved.
Did you actually review the data? Of just read the student's abstract?

The DATA shows a 21.6% increase in nest success in the three study counties (Wayne, Lawrence, and Giles) following the delay. Simultaneously, the two "control" counties (Maury and Bedford), which undoubtedly saw increased early hunting pressure from people who couldn't hunt in the study counties, saw a 4.9% decrease in nest success.

I'm not a statistician, but that seems like data indicating that the season delay may have helped.
 

Southern Sportsman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
3,399
Location
West TN
Here is one of the many.


Google is your friend.
That's a student's thesis paper. It contains data, but it is not, itself, data. If you read the actual data therein, you may be surprised.
 

deerfever

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
1,852
Location
USA
I don't know where the preoccupation with killing comes from. Isn't 2 enough? Turkey hunting is as close as there is to catch and release in hunting, isn't the whole thing with turkey hunting calling a bird into shotgun range? Or … is it really about the social media pics and being able to say you tagged out to anybody that will listen?
When the limit was 4 , 6.4 percent of people killed the limit, when it was 3, 9 percent killed the limit. You are correct most people kill either 1 or 2 it's always around 90 percent or more each year. We have killed around 30,000 birds for the last 23 years no matter the limit, except 2020 when we killed more for obvious reasons of Covid. So yes most kill 1 or 2.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240326-153916.png
    Screenshot_20240326-153916.png
    378.5 KB · Views: 3

REN

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
9,348
Location
Wilson County, TN

I don't know where the preoccupation with killing comes from. Isn't 2 enough? Turkey hunting is as close as there is to catch and release in hunting, isn't the whole thing with turkey hunting calling a bird into shotgun range? Or … is it really about the social media pics and being able to say you tagged out to anybody that will listen?

I get your point but at the same time I enjoy to hunt and spend time in the field. Im not a social media warrior by any stretch but if Im fortunate enough to harvest 2 birds in 3 days then Im done. However if the limit (and population in my spots) allows 1 more then I could stretch out that last one longer. If I eat the tag because that 3rd one didnt happen EXACTLY how I wanted it to then Im happy to eat the tag (and have pleny in the past when it was limit of 4). I hunt solo 90% of the season so I dont get lots of opportunities to go after I have used my tags.
to say KILLING isnt part of the hunt would be lying, but I will say KILLING isnt a measurement of success of a hunt by any stretch
 

paboom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
225
Location
Tennessee
That's a student's thesis paper. It contains data, but it is not, itself, data. If you read the actual data therein, you may be surprised.
I have read it. A couple times actually. I'm at work so I don't have time to spell it out, but here's a quick snip-it of part of the results.

Hatchability averaged 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.90) over all 6 years. Before the delay,hatchability was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.99) in no-delay counties and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.9) indelayed counties. After the delay, hatchability was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.00) in no-delay29counties and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.94) in delayed counties (Table 2.2). The hatchability model indicated no difference before and after the season delay in delayed counties compared with nodelay counties (n = 86, β = 0.82, SEβ = 0.84, P Interaction, 82 = 0.33, Table 2.3).

This study is only 103 pages so it's an easy read. I would encourage people to read it themselves and form their own conclusion.
 

Latest posts

Top