Deerbuster1996
Well-Known Member
All counties that are open for fall season are under a 1 bird limit
And spring Juvi is now 1 per day instead of 1 per weekend.
And spring Juvi is now 1 per day instead of 1 per weekend.
That was a dumb move but that's nothing new to them. Probably have no idea to the consequences that this change can have.Setterman":354o9jgu said:Stupid ***** law on the youth season. Every year Twra gets dumber and dumber.
It's a quest to screw up our hunting as bad as they possibly can. Morons....
.....and the doe harvest too. Most hunters will not be near as aggressive at targeting does as they were in the past in fear of killing a short tined spike, thus having to punch a buck tag.Hunt 365":11q53ign said:I think it will cut down on spike and button harvest
Or killing and not tagging.Andy S.":2ibyfsru said:.....and the doe harvest too. Most hunters will not be near as aggressive at targeting does as they were in the past in fear of killing a short tined spike/button, thus having to punch a buck tag.Hunt 365":2ibyfsru said:I think it will cut down on spike and button harvest
dhpro":1t0lzya1 said:Just curious .never knew the fall birds were hunted hard?is this a big sport in some areas. No dog in fight just wondering if it's anything to wonder about
if that's how fall season used to work, then Twra has gone in the right direction and people here gotta quit crying over small things like an extra bird on the juvi hunt. It's not perfect yet but we still have birds across most of the state.megalomaniac":1grbzrzz said:dhpro":1grbzrzz said:Just curious .never knew the fall birds were hunted hard?is this a big sport in some areas. No dog in fight just wondering if it's anything to wonder about
The vast majority of hunters do not chase birds in the fall. I know of a select few that were slaughtering them and stacking them like cordwood though. In fact, I heard of one fellow that killed 60 one fall back when there were draw tags good for 6 birds each tag and you could buy the unsold tags. Just one of those people in your county and they did a significant amount of damage to a localized population. Similar to farmers with depredation permits. Absolutely devastating on localized flocks, but not a statewide problem.
Deerbuster1996":109ia65i said:Or killing and not tagging.Andy S.":109ia65i said:.....and the doe harvest too. Most hunters will not be near as aggressive at targeting does as they were in the past in fear of killing a short tined spike/button, thus having to punch a buck tag.Hunt 365":109ia65i said:I think it will cut down on spike and button harvest
With the online check in it sure does happen more often. Some Hunters who kill a button now wouldn't want to use a buck tag on them and either leave in the field or just not tag it.Hunt 365":wfk3z1u5 said:Deerbuster1996":wfk3z1u5 said:Or killing and not tagging.Andy S.":wfk3z1u5 said:.....and the doe harvest too. Most hunters will not be near as aggressive at targeting does as they were in the past in fear of killing a short tined spike/button, thus having to punch a buck tag.Hunt 365 said:I think it will cut down on spike and button harvest
By that logic, kill and not tag exists all the time.
A button buck still does not count as a buck or antlered deer, so no reason to take either measure you mentioned above. A true button buck is legally an antlerless deer.Deerbuster1996":fv96uqe8 said:Some Hunters who kill a button now wouldn't want to use a buck tag on them and either leave in the field or just not tag it.