Re: Moving to Lock On Stands
Winchester":faa3glvc said:
All types of stands have a place in the serious hunters toolbag.
Agree.
But if I were limited to a single stand (or two), it would be a climber (or two).
In times past I used mostly hang-on stands.
One of the "issues" for me was keeping up with all of them, and because there were so many, it actually became more time consumptive than simply using 2 or 3 climbers.
Hang-ons have their place, and I'm still using them, but more of my hunting will be out of climbers.
Like I said, if I were limited to one or two stands, it would be 100% climbers.
But if I were limited to 3 stands, it would be 2 climbers and 1 hang-on.
I also use ladder stands (as well as permanent tower/box blinds) a little, too, but generally believe have better odds at older deer from hang-ons and climbers. There are times and places where one way makes more sense than another, including sometimes simply hunting on the ground with no "stand" at all.
As hunters, it often seems our biggest downfall is placing too much emphasis on comfort and convenience rather than what provides the best opportunities for what we claim to want most. Well, I guess some mainly do want just to sit in comfort, even if the situation they choose provides low odds for what they would prefer to kill most. On a nasty, windy, rainy day, those enclosed permanent blinds can sure make one feel more "comfortable", have not a stand to carry, even get more sleep (both at night and while hunting).
Seriously, when I pack in a climber, I generally get up 30 minutes earlier, then it takes longer to get out of the woods when the hunting ends. Of course, if you "pack in" a hang-on, you'll still need extra time compared to just walking up to a pre-placed ladder or permanent stand.