Looks like the SEC rules 1st college playoff poll

[gator-n-buck]

COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYOFF RANKINGS

http://www.al.com/auburnfootball/index. ... tball.html

1. Mississippi State

2. Florida State

3. Auburn

4. Ole Miss

5. Oregon

6. Alabama

7. TCU

8. Michigan State

9. Kansas State

10. [color:#FF0000]Notre Dame[/color]

11. Georgia

12. Arizona

13. Baylor

14. Arizona State

15. Nebraska

16. Ohio State

17. Utah

18. Oklahoma

19. LSU

20. West Virginia

21. Clemson

22. UCLA

23. East Carolina

24. Duke

25. Louisville

 

[Vermin93]

 

[darn2ten]

I just have to ask you why that is BS? I'm being serious, a serious explanation of why that list should be different?

 

[Vermin93]

Sure....

Data

Selection committee members will have a wealth of information including review of video, statistics and their own expertise to guide them in their deliberations. They will emphasize obvious factors like win-loss records, strength of schedule, conference championships won, head-to-head results and results against common opponents.

This is the resume for #2

Oklahoma State W 37-31
Citadel W 37-12
#22 Clemson W 23-17 OT
@ NC State W 56-41
Wake Forest W 43-3
@ Syracuse W 38-20

This is the resume for #10

Rice W 48-17
Michigan W 31-0
Purdue W 30-14
Syracuse W 31-15
#14 Stanford W 17-14
North Carolina W 50-43

Considering what happened when #2 played #10, Either #2 is too high or #10 is too low.

 

[gator-n-buck]

See you at the Music City Bowl....

 

[Gravey]

The anti-SEC crowd just needs to chill a bit and I'm not talking about vermin. I work with ACC and Little 10 guys and they were whining today. There are still head to head matchups between the top SEC teams so its all going to change soon.

 

[farmin68]

See you at the Music City Bowl....

Bwaaaaahhhh!!!!

 

[farmin68]

Sure....

Data

Selection committee members will have a wealth of information including review of video, statistics and their own expertise to guide them in their deliberations. They will emphasize obvious factors like win-loss records, strength of schedule, conference championships won, head-to-head results and results against common opponents.

This is the resume for #2

Oklahoma State W 37-31
Citadel W 37-12
#22 Clemson W 23-17 OT
@ NC State W 56-41
Wake Forest W 43-3
@ Syracuse W 38-20

This is the resume for #10

Rice W 48-17
Michigan W 31-0
Purdue W 30-14
Syracuse W 31-15
#14 Stanford W 17-14
North Carolina W 50-43

Considering what happened when #2 played #10, Either #2 is too high or #10 is too low.

There's more to it than a win/loss record.

You also forgot to mention which is the defending national championship team. A team that is more than just one of two undefeated teams.

 

[darn2ten]

It's all about strength of schedule to me. FSU is a good football team, but really, who have they played? So if I looked at that really FSU should move down a few spots. The one that really gets me is Michigan State who has lost to #16 Ohio State and #10 ND, but is still at #8? Things are going to move around because some in the top 4 still have to play each other, and somebody is moving down.

 

[Vermin93]

Sure....

Data

Selection committee members will have a wealth of information including review of video, statistics and their own expertise to guide them in their deliberations. They will emphasize obvious factors like win-loss records, strength of schedule, conference championships won, head-to-head results and results against common opponents.

This is the resume for #2

Oklahoma State W 37-31
Citadel W 37-12
#22 Clemson W 23-17 OT
@ NC State W 56-41
Wake Forest W 43-3
@ Syracuse W 38-20

This is the resume for #10

Rice W 48-17
Michigan W 31-0
Purdue W 30-14
Syracuse W 31-15
#14 Stanford W 17-14
North Carolina W 50-43

Considering what happened when #2 played #10, Either #2 is too high or #10 is too low.

There's more to it than a win/loss record.

You also forgot to mention which is the defending national championship team. A team that is more than just one of two undefeated teams.

Justify FSU @ #2 keeping in mind that one yellow flag in Tallahassee separates #2 from #10. 2013 is not supposed to factor into the process. Good luck.

 

[gator-n-buck]

It's all about strength of schedule to me. FSU is a good football team, but really, who have they played? So if I looked at that really FSU should move down a few spots. The one that really gets me is Michigan State who has lost to #16 Ohio State and #10 ND, but is still at #8? Things are going to move around because some in the top 4 still have to play each other, and somebody is moving down.

They will have to play the Gators...

 

[gator-n-buck]

Sure....

Data

Selection committee members will have a wealth of information including review of video, statistics and their own expertise to guide them in their deliberations. They will emphasize obvious factors like win-loss records, strength of schedule, conference championships won, head-to-head results and results against common opponents.

This is the resume for #2

Oklahoma State W 37-31
Citadel W 37-12
#22 Clemson W 23-17 OT
@ NC State W 56-41
Wake Forest W 43-3
@ Syracuse W 38-20

This is the resume for #10

Rice W 48-17
Michigan W 31-0
Purdue W 30-14
Syracuse W 31-15
#14 Stanford W 17-14
North Carolina W 50-43

Considering what happened when #2 played #10, Either #2 is too high or #10 is too low.

There's more to it than a win/loss record.

You also forgot to mention which is the defending national championship team. A team that is more than just one of two undefeated teams.

Justify FSU @ #2 keeping in mind that one yellow flag in Tallahassee separates #2 from #10. 2013 is not supposed to factor into the process. Good luck.

I will be your Huckleberry... They won the N/C last year. When was the last time ND won it....

 

[Gravey]

It's all about strength of schedule to me. FSU is a good football team, but really, who have they played? So if I looked at that really FSU should move down a few spots. The one that really gets me is Michigan State who has lost to #16 Ohio State and #10 ND, but is still at #8? Things are going to move around because some in the top 4 still have to play each other, and somebody is moving down.

Michigan State's only loss is to Oregon. They haven't played OSU yet and don't think they play the golden domers this year.

 

[darn2ten]

Sure....

Data

Selection committee members will have a wealth of information including review of video, statistics and their own expertise to guide them in their deliberations. They will emphasize obvious factors like win-loss records, strength of schedule, conference championships won, head-to-head results and results against common opponents.

This is the resume for #2

Oklahoma State W 37-31
Citadel W 37-12
#22 Clemson W 23-17 OT
@ NC State W 56-41
Wake Forest W 43-3
@ Syracuse W 38-20

This is the resume for #10

Rice W 48-17
Michigan W 31-0
Purdue W 30-14
Syracuse W 31-15
#14 Stanford W 17-14
North Carolina W 50-43

Considering what happened when #2 played #10, Either #2 is too high or #10 is too low.

There's more to it than a win/loss record.

You also forgot to mention which is the defending national championship team. A team that is more than just one of two undefeated teams.

Justify FSU @ #2 keeping in mind that one yellow flag in Tallahassee separates #2 from #10. 2013 is not supposed to factor into the process. Good luck.

Well unforunately it is weighting in on the process I'm sure. However not a single team ND has played and beat is ranked in the top 25 right now. FSU beat #21 Clemson and #10 ND.

 

[darn2ten]

It's all about strength of schedule to me. FSU is a good football team, but really, who have they played? So if I looked at that really FSU should move down a few spots. The one that really gets me is Michigan State who has lost to #16 Ohio State and #10 ND, but is still at #8? Things are going to move around because some in the top 4 still have to play each other, and somebody is moving down.

Michigan State's only loss is to Oregon. They haven't played OSU yet and don't think they play the golden domers this year.

Ha! My bad, your right. Shows you how much I pay attention to Big 10 football. I must have looked at last years schedule for Michigan State, oh well who have they played anyway besides Oregon, who basicaly has only played them and #25 UCLA.

 

[darn2ten]

It's all about strength of schedule to me. FSU is a good football team, but really, who have they played? So if I looked at that really FSU should move down a few spots. The one that really gets me is Michigan State who has lost to #16 Ohio State and #10 ND, but is still at #8? Things are going to move around because some in the top 4 still have to play each other, and somebody is moving down.

The will have to play the Gators...

Yeah, unforunately that's not really funny! :sick:

 

[TeamMainStreet]

I think the Gators could take FSU and ND at the same time. :whistle: With one Driskel behind their back.

 

[BamaProud]

ND has not beaten a team that is currently ranked in the top 25.

 

[mjac]

It's all about strength of schedule to me. FSU is a good football team, but really, who have they played? So if I looked at that really FSU should move down a few spots. The one that really gets me is Michigan State who has lost to #16 Ohio State and #10 ND, but is still at #8? Things are going to move around because some in the top 4 still have to play each other, and somebody is moving down.

They will have to play the Gators...

The outcome of that game will keep UF from becoming bowl eligible.

 

[baddnole]

SEC leads all conferences in arrests for the last 4 year and has 8 teams with more arrests that FSU has in 2014. FSU has 4 including arrests, charges and citations. UGA leads the nation with 13, YES 13.

SEC is the biggest thug conference in all CFB.
This post was edited on 10/31 8:14 PM by guynole

Link: ESPN/SEC facts they ingore
http://arrestnation.com/2014-arrest-stats/