megalomaniac
Well-Known Member
Here's the numbers as of yesterday according to TWRA at the presentation in Bolivar.
224 deer tested in Fayette and Hardeman with results returned.... 24 positive... 900 pending...
Initial prevalence rates are 10%. Not good. If numbers hold up, expect another 90 to come back positive in the hot zone.
Bright side... Mcnairy has zero out of 50 resulted back. Another 200 pending.
Another interesting note.... this was the first year of 'risk based sampling'. Prior random sampling methods were woefully inadequate and allowed the disease to be missed.
TWRA did not expound on the definition of 'risk based sampling', but I'm sure they took a page from MS....
In MS, prior to the detection of CWD last year, increased number of samples were obtained from counties with more high fence enclosures.
Sent from my SCH-R970X using Tapatalk
224 deer tested in Fayette and Hardeman with results returned.... 24 positive... 900 pending...
Initial prevalence rates are 10%. Not good. If numbers hold up, expect another 90 to come back positive in the hot zone.
Bright side... Mcnairy has zero out of 50 resulted back. Another 200 pending.
Another interesting note.... this was the first year of 'risk based sampling'. Prior random sampling methods were woefully inadequate and allowed the disease to be missed.
TWRA did not expound on the definition of 'risk based sampling', but I'm sure they took a page from MS....
In MS, prior to the detection of CWD last year, increased number of samples were obtained from counties with more high fence enclosures.
Sent from my SCH-R970X using Tapatalk