Found this interesting
Thanks for making me look like a dumb ass
Im just jealous of those bucks you've been posting.Thanks for making me look like a dumb ass![]()
You're not a dumbass. I have been studying transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (not specifically CWD) for over 30 years. CWD is a complex disease and, in many ways, unlike most other diseases. What I find frustrating is that deer hunters, rather than learning about the disease themselves, believe contrarians like Dr. Deer & Uncle Ted, both of whom maintain their relevance by disagreeing with mainstream wildlife disease experts. Perhaps one of the hardest points for some to accept about CWD is the long incubation period. of 18 to 24 months. So, some people have a hard time accepting that something is truly wrong with an infected deer because 95.5% of the time the deer is infected it looks & acts normal. The voice of reason regarding CWD, in my opinion, is Dr. Grant Woods. And the biggest effect of CWD isn't that it will decimate the deer herd but that it changes the culture of how we interact with deer. In areas where a large percentage of the deer are infected, lots of folks won't shoot does so deer management is greatly decreased. Common sense regulations to decrease spread & research to try to develop an oral vaccine are where we need to start. In people, polio & smallpox never reached herd immunity. They were both eradicated by scientific research.Thanks for making me look like a dumb ass![]()
Sorry but having survived the Covid pandemic, some folks are jaded about complex diseases where the experts tell us a disease we can't see any effects of requires us to completely change our way of life. And controversial treatments mandated by the government turn out to be deceptive and neither safe nor effective.You're not a dumbass. I have been studying transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (not specifically CWD) for over 30 years. CWD is a complex disease and, in many ways, unlike most other diseases. What I find frustrating is that deer hunters, rather than learning about the disease themselves, believe contrarians like Dr. Deer & Uncle Ted, both of whom maintain their relevance by disagreeing with mainstream wildlife disease experts. Perhaps one of the hardest points for some to accept about CWD is the long incubation period. of 18 to 24 months. So, some people have a hard time accepting that something is truly wrong with an infected deer because 95.5% of the time the deer is infected it looks & acts normal. The voice of reason regarding CWD, in my opinion, is Dr. Grant Woods. And the biggest effect of CWD isn't that it will decimate the deer herd but that it changes the culture of how we interact with deer. In areas where a large percentage of the deer are infected, lots of folks won't shoot does so deer management is greatly decreased. Common sense regulations to decrease spread & research to try to develop an oral vaccine are where we need to start. In people, polio & smallpox never reached herd immunity. They were both eradicated by scientific research.
I truly understand this sentiment. And to add to it, CWD (and other TSEs) are still not well understood. Researchers "think" they know how and where it is transmitted, but don't know for sure. They "think" they understand how it functions, but still don't know for sure. Yet then we have wildlife agencies and other interested groups mandating draconian measures to "combat the spread" of a disease no one really understands, even with very little science-based evidence that these measures will do anything. At times, these groups appear to be willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.Sorry but having survived the Covid pandemic, some folks are jaded about complex diseases where the experts tell us a disease we can't see any effects of requires us to completely change our way of life. And controversial treatments mandated by the government turn out to be deceptive and neither safe nor effective.
Thanks for making me look like a dumb ass![]()
The big problem from my POV, and I'm glad you'd brought up Dr. Deer, is the misuse of information by folks who know better. These guys are a major source of public misunderstanding. This is and has always been a problem of the future with an unknown outcome other than knowing there will be some negative consequences generations from now. And most of these guys know better, but they've monetized their opinions and are more interested in telling people what they want to hear than to actually inform them.I truly understand this sentiment. And to add to it, CWD (and other TSEs) are still not well understood. Researchers "think" they know how and where it is transmitted, but don't know for sure. They "think" they understand how it functions, but still don't know for sure. Yet then we have wildlife agencies and other interested groups mandating draconian measures to "combat the spread" of a disease no one really understands, even with very little science-based evidence that these measures will do anything. At times, these groups appear to be willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I appreciate their concern, and their willingness to try different measures, but how about we have hard data on the disease and hard data on factors that actually successfully combat the disease before implementing blanket measure.
View attachment 287125
Is this what you thought it'd look like ?
EXCELLENT post lol. I agree.The big problem from my POV, and I'm glad you'd brought up Dr. Deer, is the misuse of information by folks who know better. These guys are a major source of public misunderstanding. This is and has always been a problem of the future with an unknown outcome other than knowing there will be some negative consequences generations from now. And most of these guys know better, but they've monetized their opinions and are more interested in telling people what they want to hear than to actually inform them.
The reality of the state of CWD research, as I understand it, is that we have insufficient information to understand where we land between best case and worst case scenarios. We know enough to know that the worst case scenario is catastrophic, but we don't know if its any more likely than any other potential outcome. Considering the magnitude of the worst case, I can understand why some folks in position of authority have attempted to delay spread in the interim. The problem is that the only real delay tactic is culling--which is an extreme measure, especially in the absence of any real negative impact on herd health caused by CWD in the present. Whether or not this is what we should be doing is over my pay grade.
On top of that, without solid understanding of how the herd will be affected in 30 or 50 years or more, we could find out tomorrow that the culling was completely unnecessary or the best thing we could have done. Its a complicated issue that shouldn't be ignored and folks making these decisions aren't doing so out of ignorance or malice. No matter what is done its going to suck in some fashion, whether its herd annihilation in 80 years or a herd with decreased life expectancy in 30 years.
Federal dollars make "conservative" state officials or agencies do stupid things.CWD is long for BS in my opinion. Im sure its a real thing but what twra did with it is a pure scam
And you didn't read that it was politicians that forced the baiting bullshit through? it wasn't TWRA.Now this isn't a debate about baiting. But were we not told that baiting would enhance the spread of CWD. Now it's ok as long as you've paid the fee to bait. This is the kind of information we as hunters are getting. Either it is or it isn't spreading the disease faster. What can we do about cwd. Nothing that I can see. Whats been done in the states that's had 40 years. Nothing that I can see. But kill em all isn't gonna work either. So any information one way or the other seems pointless if nothing is gonna fix it.
TWRA is an administrative agency. They will always be at the mercy of the legislature. They cannot act but through statutory grant of authority. Their regs must be in furtherance of the legislative prerogative. The scope of their authority is explained here: https://law.justia.com/codes/tennessee/title-70/chapter-1/part-3/section-70-1-305/That's why I didn't say TWRA. How is it they are not the last say in regs and rule changes. They are a separate entity from the state gov. Or did politicians come up with this. And the TWRA get pressured to approve it. Who makes the rules and regs.
Yes. they know the prion in question and its genetic code. That's how they've been able to show that - to date - no one has gotten CJD from eating infected venison. When people in Europe started getting CJD from eating beef infected with Mad Cow Disease (MCD), it produced a slightly different genetic variant of CJD than what naturally occurs in people. They call it CJD(v), the "v" being for "variant." CJD naturally occurs in humans at a rate of 1 in a million people. The genetic variant version, that comes from being infected by MCD infected 206 people out of the estimate 38 million that ate infected beef, producing an infection rate of somewhere around 1 in 185,000 that were exposed. To date, no one has been diagnosed with CJD with a variant linked to CWD.I certainly don't have the perfect solution, and not sure if there is a perfect solution but the blanket regulations certainly weren't the best solution.
Genuine question, has a state agency or reputable research facility confirmed that this is, in fact, a prion like CJD? Outside of the CDC, which has lost confidence from the American public in the last 5 years…
Wasn't a lot of the transmission with MCD due to sloppy meat processing which allowed nerve tissue to be processed into meat? I didn't think it was transmissible through ingestion of muscle meat alone.Yes. they know the prion in question and its genetic code. That's how they've been able to show that - to date - no one has gotten CJD from eating infected venison. When people in Europe started getting CJD from eating beef infected with Mad Cow Disease (MCD), it produced a slightly different genetic variant of CJD than what naturally occurs in people. They call it CJD(v), the "v" being for "variant." CJD naturally occurs in humans at a rate of 1 in a million people. The genetic variant version, that comes from being infected by MCD infected 206 people out of the estimate 38 million that ate infected beef, producing an infection rate of somewhere around 1 in 185,000 that were exposed. To date, no one has been diagnosed with CJD with a variant linked to CWD.
Europeans eat every part of animal, unlike us in the U.S. Brains and all internal organs are considered food items. Liver, kidneys, heart, intestines, everything.Wasn't a lot of the transmission with MCD due to sloppy meat processing which allowed nerve tissue to be processed into meat? I didn't think it was transmissible through injection of muscle meat alone.
That explains their breath.Europeans eat every part of animal, unlike us in the U.S. Brains and all internal organs are considered food items. Liver, kidneys, heart, intestines, everything.
Thanks alot.....laughed so hard I spit part of my lunch on my phone screen!That explains their breath.
HA!That explains their breath.
What exactly is it? Is it alive? Is it like radiation and malforms what it comes in contact with? Is it a poison compound? What the hell is it?