Here's the thing about Reconyx...Yes, they definitely cost a lot more when you purchase them. I have the HC600s and they were all $500.00 each bought in bulk. They add up, that's for sure.
BUT.......
When you look at the overall cost of Reconyx cameras, I would argue that they are actually LESS expensive than any camera on the market. Why? Because they work. When you buy a cheaper camera that fails, those costs add up as well, it's just on the back end. Think about all the gas and money spent going to check cameras that failed. There is nothing worse than driving to your property after your cameras have been out for 2-3 weeks and find that you do not have a single picture, the batteries are dead, every image is white, etc. AND the one thing that cheaper cameras cost you that you can never get back is your time. Now, not only did you waste all your time and money checking a camera that did nothing, you have to then mail the camera back in and wait for repairs. You get your camera back, a few months go by (if you're lucky) and then you start the process all over again.
Four years ago I ran several tests between Covert, Moultrie, Cuddeback and Reconyx. I put them all over the same lick with similar settings. The Reconyx took the most pics and picked up subjects that the other cameras did not. It wasn't even close. And to me, that missing data is a cost as well since I depend on that data to make critical decisions. Since then, I only buy Reconyx and have not had a single failure. I still have a couple of Coverts and they are the best of the Chinese cameras in my opinion, but nothing beats a Reconyx.
So sure, you can buy cheaper cameras. And yes, you can buy 3-5 cameras for what one Reconyx will cost you. But if the cheaper cameras aren't taking pictures, have you really saved any money? I would argue that in many cases, you actually spend more.