Your wildest idea to combat CWD?
First, beware ideas that are more about "doing something" than doing something worth doing.
Secondly, beware the fear-mongering so often used to push an agenda that may have little do with the problem.
Just seeing what has happened, over decades, in other states,
here are my ideas:
1) I like what TWRA has done/proposed regarding transporting (or not) harvested deer.
------- This is good, and should do more good than the nominal harm of its inconvenience.
2) I don't like TWRA's proposal to increase buck-only hunting, especially during the summertime.
------- Believe this is a bad idea that will do more overall harm than good.
------- Any increase in buck-hunting and buck limits will likely decrease the doe harvest (counterproductive overall).
3) So what would I do differently (but mainly just in the "hot zone")?
------- Increase doe-hunting opportunities (without increasing the buck limit).
------- This could be done by making the muzzleloader season segment "rifle" --- THIS would greatly increase the number of deer killed, not just bucks, but DEER!
And, if that's not enough, then make the archery season "rifle" as well.
Just keep the buck limit at two, and the doe harvest will increase via allowing hunters to hunt with greatly more effective weapons (a rifle vs. a bow).
Oh, and yes, the buck harvest will also greatly increase, even with a 2-buck limit, mainly because there would be so much more earlier hunting with a rifle.
------- The ongoing deer population is mainly controlled by the doe harvest, and that's where more focus should be.
"Buck Only" deer hunting has always been about increasing the deer density, exactly the opposite what CWD experts say we should do.
Which is much of my opposition to the summertime buck-only proposal & doubling of the buck limit.
------- Lastly, again, it's not that killing more bucks might not be of benefit in slowing the spread of CWD, but rather, as proposed, it will cause fewer female deer to be killed, which may then make the increased buck-only hunting more harmful than beneficial.