Roost 1":2y720nia said:
I know hunting pressure plays a huge part, but I think big woods deer are the hardest to hunt.
Agree about pressure & big big woods, mainly because the deer are harder to pattern, more nomadic, and tend to range over larger areas.
A good TN example of this would be the Cherokee National Forest.
Can be really tough bow-hunting; gun hunting, not so tough, but not as "easy" as farmland deer hunting.
IMO, the "hardest" deer hunting I've experienced (at least for older deer) is big cover deer.
What I'm talking about is an area of thousands of acres that is predominately heavy cover,
very little ground level visibility, no trees large enough to climb, but even if you find one,
you can hardly see down into this thick mess.
Easiest deer hunting (imo) is farmland deer,
where there are more ag fields than woods or cover.
You'll find some of this in most every state, but some Mid-Western states may be predominantly this kind of deer hunting.
Generally speaking, I believe TN deer hunting is overall "harder" than KY deer hunting,
but some of the toughest deer hunting you'll find anywhere can be found in parts of KY.
Tennessee is a very diverse state, as are the deer habitats and deer hunting.
So is Kentucky and most states.
But whether the deer hunting anywhere is relatively "hard" or "easy" has to do with a lot more than what state you're hunting. Ongoing localized hunting practices and pressure can trump everything else.
To answer the question:
Yes, I believe TN deer hunting is "harder" than many states,
but certainly a lot "easier" than many as well, just for a variety of reasons.
Imagine deer hunting in Pennsylvania where the hunters out-number the deer.