Yes, the double drop tines are deductions, which brings the score down. If they had been slightly longer, it would have been scored as an atypical and been up in the 130s. The article is about reasons why or why not a trophy is a trophy. In this case, the deer is a trophy to me even though it doesn't translate into score.Andy S.":12njcxpz said:Nice buck, congrats Gil. Does the 110" score include the double drops? He looks better than that in this one pic, although not a ton better, some better.
ROUGH COUNTRY HUNTER":1o52fsi1 said:Congrats,but I see better than 110 inches
csi-tech":2esgu40c said:I drive around Columbia and see monsters all over the place at night (on duty). Carrington Farms, Antrim Circle and hidden lakes, Gholson Hill, Trotwood Ave and many other places. I am so glad to see someone capitalizing on one of our great deer! Congratulations. I would give anything to hunt Graymere Country Club and Camp Gray owl on CC Lane. Monsters roam there at night.
Mike Belt":3umslrfu said:Good deal! As far as scoring, regardless of what a deer might score if it's a trophy to the hunter that's all that matters. As far as I'm concerned, a score only reflects a mental image of what a buck might look like without actually laying eyes on him. Also, in my mind a score should reflect what a buck grows. I just don't understand how if it's there it can be counted as a deduction. Piss on net scores. I want to know what the gross score is. I understand there's a typical and a non-typical division. The same buck can and will score differently depending on which way he's scored. Ridiculous.
10-4, what I was thinking. Congrats on your trophy, regardless of score, just as the article eludes to. Thanks again for sharing.gil1":38zl1ego said:..... atypical and been up in the 130s. The article is about reasons why or why not a trophy is a trophy. In this case, the deer is a trophy to me even though it doesn't translate into score.