tree_ghost
Well-Known Member
To me this is splitting hairs; whether you have the intent to go out looking for deer or you just happen to come across one in a field. IMO this needs to be more clearly defined by TWRA.
Again I see an issue with the means by where you harvest a animal. If you harvest an animal because You spotted it 300 yards away and poked it at 295 with a rifle, one could make the argument it's too easy, or unethical. On the other hand if you spotted an animal at 300 yards and stalked 260 and stuck it with an arrow, one could make the argument it was a skilled harvest that was made ethically. there are to many what ifs with this scenario but without the right questions being asked a right solution can't be obtained.
Again I see an issue with the means by where you harvest a animal. If you harvest an animal because You spotted it 300 yards away and poked it at 295 with a rifle, one could make the argument it's too easy, or unethical. On the other hand if you spotted an animal at 300 yards and stalked 260 and stuck it with an arrow, one could make the argument it was a skilled harvest that was made ethically. there are to many what ifs with this scenario but without the right questions being asked a right solution can't be obtained.