With the proposal coming up and seems to be a heated debate. This is a honest question for EVERYONE and I'll go ahead and get it out of the way. I'm from EAST TENNESSEE so I can't be labeled as a "local" or I think you're trying to steal "MY" blind.
The question is... How do you think your chances are any better or worse with a computer draw instead of handheld draw. Let's just use a simple example and say the top wma normally has 2000 at the handheld draw. Well now not only are you going to have those 2000 that would've been there at the handheld but an extra 2000-2500 from the computer draw. It greatly lowers your chances. I know there more dates but we're talking 3-4 day hunts and 7 day hunts. How "many" more chances is that when you almost if not more than double the participants. Let's keep it somewhat civil and leave the bashing out of the discussion and maybe someone with better mathematics than me can figure out the odds
The question is... How do you think your chances are any better or worse with a computer draw instead of handheld draw. Let's just use a simple example and say the top wma normally has 2000 at the handheld draw. Well now not only are you going to have those 2000 that would've been there at the handheld but an extra 2000-2500 from the computer draw. It greatly lowers your chances. I know there more dates but we're talking 3-4 day hunts and 7 day hunts. How "many" more chances is that when you almost if not more than double the participants. Let's keep it somewhat civil and leave the bashing out of the discussion and maybe someone with better mathematics than me can figure out the odds