N nate17 Well-Known Member Joined Aug 6, 2009 Messages 1,397 City & State/Province Missouri Aug 30, 2012 #1 Not asking anyone to give up their secrets, but are either of these worth putting the leg work in for deer hunting or would I be better off sticking to the Cherokee? Thanks in advance.
Not asking anyone to give up their secrets, but are either of these worth putting the leg work in for deer hunting or would I be better off sticking to the Cherokee? Thanks in advance.
W whistlinwingman Well-Known Member Joined Jul 11, 2005 Messages 1,965 City & State/Province Morristown Aug 30, 2012 #2 I have never deer hunted that WMA and not sure of anyone that has. I have hunted the Cherokee National Forest and probably would spend my time there.
I have never deer hunted that WMA and not sure of anyone that has. I have hunted the Cherokee National Forest and probably would spend my time there.
S SPickle Well-Known Member Joined Aug 25, 2005 Messages 1,039 City & State/Province dandridge Aug 30, 2012 #3 I agree with whistlinwingman. Stick with Cherokee hunted there a lot plenty of deer with some work to get on one
I agree with whistlinwingman. Stick with Cherokee hunted there a lot plenty of deer with some work to get on one
