ewc said:
Wes-
No sub can compare to smokeless.
You should know better.
Speedwise, you may have a point with a limited amount of 5744.
Bump the smokeless up by 700 fps (which you cannot do with BH209) and we're playing in another time zone.
Bump it up again to 3 K, and you are near lightspeed.
Smokeless subs, while nice, cannot compete performance-wise.
EWC,
Not disagreeing with you about what you posted, but the question started out as to what's the "most reliable", not what's producing the fastest velocity. IMO, AA5744 and/or BH209 are the "most reliable" in guns designed to use them. Some have pointed out the reliability of real black powder, which was not an option under my consideration.
We may all be focused more or less on different things valued most. For you, it may be velocity. For others, it's accuracy. For me, it's reliability (in a muzzleloader). Sure, a Savage smokeless with any powder you listed is very reliable. Just even more reliable with AA5744.
In terms of velocity, absolutely, no sub can compare to smokeless. That's why we're both shooting smokeless, and modern firearms use cartridges loaded with smokeless powders. But in terms of
muzzleloader "reliability", the BH209 is possibly more reliable than some smokeless powders you may be using in a muzzleloader.
One of these days, when I get one of those round tuits, I may do some wet powder testing in my Savage. What I have in mind is pointing the muzzle up, then pouring various amounts of water into the bore, allowing it to get to the powder. Would just like to know how much can get in the bore before it doesn't shoot. This is an issue to me because seems there's always a few days each year I'm muzzleloader hunting in the rain. This might be less an issue if I were more into shooting than hunting.