AXL78":3d3je94i said:I'm not good at aging, and the jawbone kind've amazed me because I had preconceptions of his age due to the pics, but is his neck not overwhelming looking for 3.5. I fully believe you guys are right. I'm not good at it, I just wanted to re-emphasize how big I thought his neck was. haha. Huge, or maybe I just haven't seen one in a while.
AXL78":1o4x4qpf said:I think that deer's teeth are an anomaly. The heavy mass, really large body weight, huge neck, and funky rack are all indications of an old deer (however rack indicates injury). Really old. The teeth don't paint that picture though. However, if a tooth were sent off, there is no way in haties I put money on 3.5. He is 5.5+. I agree teeth don't look it.
Ditto. I always like to compare both jawbones for deer that I suspect are 4.5+.hitek7":2abbj6zm said:Maybe I need to look at other side...
Not surprising.ROUGH COUNTRY HUNTER":7rft1ybp said:I have killed 2 that I knew was 5 1/2,but the jawbone showed 3 1/2.
Good idea for deer you suspect are 4.5+. Matson's Lab or Deer Age can perform cementum annuli aging.ROUGH COUNTRY HUNTER":7rft1ybp said:I am going to start sending a few jawbones off for ageing.