I am weekend warrior fisherman but like midrange / nice stuff and im starting to save up to buy a pair of finders (gonna take a couple months at least) Any opinions, comments welcome amd appreciated. Leaning toward the garmins.
Thank you sir... leaning that way myself.I have a friend that lives up on Douglas Lake. When the water is down, he is walking those bottoms and mapping structure standing right beside it. There are a bunch of old foundations, etc that hold a lot of fish once they are covered.
A few years ago, he went out with three different bass pros ahead of one of their big tournaments. One had Hummingbird, another Garmin, and the third Lowrance. All were top of the line units.
Surprising to me, he said in the quality of the underwater "picture", Hummingbird and Garmin were the best. He said the Lowrance was way lower quality than those two. IMO, Garmin has the best GPS capability, so I would lean that way.
YMMV
hard to beat the mapping on the birds, and side scanning. forward sonar they are all about neck and neck. i have birds and son has mix of garmins and lowrance.
got to have the offset up here on this end of the state where the lakes get dropped by 20 feet or more in the winter.3 years ago I would have agreed about the mapping. Now C-Map is just as good as LakeMaster, and arguably better.
The only advantage LakeMaster has is the water level offset. I can do without that.
I've found that shading makes offset unnecessary. If the lake is 20ft low, I just set 0-20ft to be red and know my shore line starts at the edge of the red. Set other depths accordingly.got to have the offset up here on this end of the state where the lakes get dropped by 20 feet or more in the winter.
lol even though i didnt say that, i see no problem. as long as you check depth with sonar and adjust.I've found that shading makes offset unnecessary. If the lake is 20ft low, I just set 0-20ft to be red and know my shore line starts at the edge of the red. Set other depths accordingly.