clinch

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

stik

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 1999
Messages
22,151
City & State/Province
lenoir city,tn
looks like next saturday will be the first trip of the year,weather permitting. we still haven't decided whether to bring the boat and fish around peachorchard or the canoe and float to clinton.
 
I've started using only large baits. I'd rather not catch many & have a chance at a large one instead of catching 20 - 30 small ones.

If you can take a kid, they'll have a blast with the small ones. The Clinch is definitely better since the slot limits, but I don't understand the brooks. My understanding is they will never grow as large as the browns, but I may be wrong.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
JQT said:
I've started using only large baits. I'd rather not catch many & have a chance at a large one instead of catching 20 - 30 small ones.

If you can take a kid, they'll have a blast with the small ones. The Clinch is definitely better since the slot limits, but I don't understand the brooks. My understanding is they will never grow as large as the browns, but I may be wrong.

You lost me. What's the down side of catching a beautiful brook trout? They aren't replacing browns, just a wonderful addition.
 
gil1 said:
JQT said:
I've started using only large baits. I'd rather not catch many & have a chance at a large one instead of catching 20 - 30 small ones.

If you can take a kid, they'll have a blast with the small ones. The Clinch is definitely better since the slot limits, but I don't understand the brooks. My understanding is they will never grow as large as the browns, but I may be wrong.

You lost me. What's the down side of catching a beautiful brook trout? They aren't replacing browns, just a wonderful addition.

the only down side i can see is brookies will rarely, if ever, reach 20 inches.
 
Keep a limit of smaller trout for the rockfish when you get to them.thatss what their feeding on mostly anyway up that far
 
mike243 said:
Keep a limit of smaller trout for the rockfish when you get to them.thatss what their feeding on mostly anyway up that far

i'm sure they eat a lot of trout but there is always a school of gizzaed shad around close everytime we see a striper.
 
gil1 said:
JQT said:
I've started using only large baits. I'd rather not catch many & have a chance at a large one instead of catching 20 - 30 small ones.

If you can take a kid, they'll have a blast with the small ones. The Clinch is definitely better since the slot limits, but I don't understand the brooks. My understanding is they will never grow as large as the browns, but I may be wrong.

You lost me. What's the down side of catching a beautiful brook trout? They aren't replacing browns, just a wonderful addition.

They are a beautiful fish, but will never reach the size of browns or bows in the Clinch. As I said if you are just looking for a tug on the line, they are fine.
 
stik said:
7mm08 said:
I don't know...I could go for a few of these!

North Fork White River....a southern tailwater with brook trout in it for years.
http://www.ozarkmtns.com/fishing/species/brook.htm

that fish is only 18 1/2 inches long and would not be legal. it would be a shame to have to release a state record fish.

You don't have to kill a fish for it to be a record. There are plenty of line class records released alive and well every year.
 
Last year I caught a 16" Brook trout out of the clinch. It was long and skinny. That fish could be in the 18" range this year. They are getting bigger and will grow to 8-10 pounds.
 
Model70Man said:
Last year I caught a 16" Brook trout out of the clinch. It was long and skinny. That fish could be in the 18" range this year. They are getting bigger and will grow to 8-10 pounds.

the biggest we have caught was just over 11 inches. i don't think they will ever reach 20 inches much less 8 lbs.
 
stik said:
Model70Man said:
Last year I caught a 16" Brook trout out of the clinch. It was long and skinny. That fish could be in the 18" range this year. They are getting bigger and will grow to 8-10 pounds.

the biggest we have caught was just over 11 inches. i don't think they will ever reach 20 inches much less 8 lbs.

IF we could get the scuds (freshwater crusteans/shrimp) back in the river like we had in the 85-early 90's I'd take that bet. We had unreal growth rates then, 1-2" per month per studies.



scuds from ONE dead trout found in the Clinch..ps. the hook was in there too!
scudsfromONEfish-1.jpg
 
I have been catching some nice browns and rainbows up there. had one brown over 20". Pulled me all over the place in my belly boat.

What day are you heading up there/ the 19th or the 27th?
 
Setterman said:
stik said:
7mm08 said:
I don't know...I could go for a few of these!

North Fork White River....a southern tailwater with brook trout in it for years.
http://www.ozarkmtns.com/fishing/species/brook.htm

that fish is only 18 1/2 inches long and would not be legal. it would be a shame to have to release a state record fish.

You don't have to kill a fish for it to be a record. There are plenty of line class records released alive and well every year.

it has to be weighed on certified scales and species verified. i doubt any kind of trout would survive that plus it is illegal to remove it from the river.
 
Diehard Hunter said:
I have been catching some nice browns and rainbows up there. had one brown over 20". Pulled me all over the place in my belly boat.

What day are you heading up there/ the 19th or the 27th?

was planning on tomorrow but it looks like no water. don't know if we'll go or not.
 
stik said:
Setterman said:
stik said:
7mm08 said:
I don't know...I could go for a few of these!

North Fork White River....a southern tailwater with brook trout in it for years.
http://www.ozarkmtns.com/fishing/species/brook.htm

that fish is only 18 1/2 inches long and would not be legal. it would be a shame to have to release a state record fish.

You don't have to kill a fish for it to be a record. There are plenty of line class records released alive and well every year.

it has to be weighed on certified scales and species verified. i doubt any kind of trout would survive that plus it is illegal to remove it from the river.
clinch trout aren't any different than other trout which have been released after being recorded for records.

You can get certified boga grips, and other small scales.

First one actually has to reach that size and if I had my way another brook trout would never be put in the river. They are pathetic.
 
Setterman said:
stik said:
Setterman said:
stik said:
7mm08 said:
I don't know...I could go for a few of these!

North Fork White River....a southern tailwater with brook trout in it for years.
http://www.ozarkmtns.com/fishing/species/brook.htm

that fish is only 18 1/2 inches long and would not be legal. it would be a shame to have to release a state record fish.

You don't have to kill a fish for it to be a record. There are plenty of line class records released alive and well every year.

it has to be weighed on certified scales and species verified. i doubt any kind of trout would survive that plus it is illegal to remove it from the river.
clinch trout aren't any different than other trout which have been released after being recorded for records.

You can get certified boga grips, and other small scales.

First one actually has to reach that size and if I had my way another brook trout would never be put in the river. They are pathetic.

http://www.tn.gov/twra/fish/FishRec_PDF ... cation.pdf


i see no way to release a fish and get it certified as a state record.
 
Stic me & caretaker arev gonna drown a few worms tommorow.we will keep a lookout for you all
 

Latest posts

Back
Top