Why do so many folks that want a 1 buck limit want to reduce time to hunt? is this another attempt to grow bigger bucks by limiting every body else in the state? you cant hunt my property so why limit me to benefit you? set a limit then open season, use the rock bow or gun you want. No 1 method should get priority over another unless its a safety issue . keep advocating cutting out any section of hunting time only plays into the hands of folks that don't understand and or like hunters. If you are tired of hunting go ahead and clean your equipment up and go play golf but don't assume I am done for the year! as far as I know dropping the limit hasn't raised the bar the buck size on average, does anybody have the stats to show where the hunting has improved due to reduced limits? how about hunter satisfaction? I was under the impression that twra was to maintain the herd at a sustainable level while providing maximum hunting opportunity's. I firmly believe that the WMA's should all be set as strict requirements for bucks like Catoosa, then the folks who really like that style of hunting can have at it. that way it wont impact the majority of the hunters in the state. ymmvknightrider":1cf0qqkp said:and I want to hunt with my gun as long as you can hunt with your bowgobblesandgrunts":1cf0qqkp said:Just personal preference, neither one is more right or wrong than the other, I only bow hunt and would like to see gun season shortened. I know A LOT of people gun hunt and that's their own choice. But as for me, I'd like a shorter gun season
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk