Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Gun Owners Forums
Handguns
"Will There Be Mass Noncompliance On ATF's Pistol Brace Rule?" (and an explanation of the current ruling)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaveTN" data-source="post: 5582941" data-attributes="member: 3052"><p>I wouldn't want to be the test dummy. You would be arrested for having a short, barreled rifle. And that is a law. You are correct that they don't have the authority to do what they are doing. But they didn't have the authority to make the brace available as a non NFA conversion in the first place. </p><p></p><p>They didn't have the authority to make short, barreled rifles legal by calling "Pistols". But they did it. That's going to be the next drama.</p><p></p><p>Everyone was okay with these clowns sitting behind a desk and making up stupid rulings that violate the law, as long as they were creating something the gun owners wanted. But when they said "Oops, we got it wrong" all of a sudden they don't have that authority.</p><p></p><p>Personally I believe we should be able to have machine guns, but congress disagrees with me. I played the "AR Pistol" game for awhile. But found out a 5.56 AR that can't be shouldered is a useless POS. So I got rid of mine. If I had one with a brace laying around I would jump on the free registration thing. But I don't need one enough to mess with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaveTN, post: 5582941, member: 3052"] I wouldn't want to be the test dummy. You would be arrested for having a short, barreled rifle. And that is a law. You are correct that they don't have the authority to do what they are doing. But they didn't have the authority to make the brace available as a non NFA conversion in the first place. They didn't have the authority to make short, barreled rifles legal by calling "Pistols". But they did it. That's going to be the next drama. Everyone was okay with these clowns sitting behind a desk and making up stupid rulings that violate the law, as long as they were creating something the gun owners wanted. But when they said "Oops, we got it wrong" all of a sudden they don't have that authority. Personally I believe we should be able to have machine guns, but congress disagrees with me. I played the "AR Pistol" game for awhile. But found out a 5.56 AR that can't be shouldered is a useless POS. So I got rid of mine. If I had one with a brace laying around I would jump on the free registration thing. But I don't need one enough to mess with it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Gun Owners Forums
Handguns
"Will There Be Mass Noncompliance On ATF's Pistol Brace Rule?" (and an explanation of the current ruling)
Top