Poser":3ix21ybm said:
To psychoanalyse those conditions and influences, I think that a lot of young men in recent years have started to look to a previous generation for the definition of masculinity. If you grew up in a rather bland, suburban environment of the 80s, 90s, 2000s where masculine influences were/are largely "tame" compared to examples of masculinity of previous generations, it sort of makes sense. Generation X, Z and Z looked to the the examples of their grandfather's generations: Those guys had beards, wore dirty work clothes, ground coffee by hand in the morning, shaved with a straight razor, drove vehicles that required a lot of maintenance, maybe used bacon grease for beard wax. They had tools and implements that required maintenance and were not disposable i.e. you fixed things instead of buying replacements. Look at the popularity of old time string band music these days, or even the late career celebration of Johnny Cash, for example: Granpappy's music.
Poser,
Probably one of the best psychoanalyses of the hipster movement I've ever read. Well done.
I still struggle to define the genre. Although I don't deal with hipsters extensively, I do participate in several activities that are virtual hipster requirements, hence I come in contact with them frequently (i.e. craft beer, vaping, etc.). Although I differ with aspects of the hipster belief system, I can't think of ANY social movement I completely agree with either. And even though individuals within any social group can be real tools, so far, the vast majority of hipsters I've had social contact with have been very pleasant, innovative, and interesting people. Yes, many believe they are way too cool for everybody else, but what young-person movement of the past HASN'T thought that? I'm sure I thought that way when I was 25.