Winchester
Well-Known Member
Largest buck killed in the entire county was 150 with 125 making the top 10. Sound familiar!
Well said!Pursuit Hunter said:My favorite quote: "More people will look at the bigger buck, for sure, but the antlers really have nothing to do with your hunting ability".
The current culture of deer hunting is obsessed with antler size. Almost no consideration is given to the skill employed in the kill. I will take greater satisfaction in a doe or average-racked buck that I killed at 20 yards using my knowledge and hard work to get close, over a large-racked buck that happened to wander into an open field 250 yards away. Skill versus luck.
Unfortunately, skill in not a quantifiable commodity. B&C score is. Skill doesnt require the purchase of the latest gadgets and gizmos which fund the hornography that we see every day and that creates the unrealistic expectations that are so rampant.
At its core, hunting is a very personal pursuit. The obsession with quantifying success based on antler score has gotten things all out of whack both in terms of what constitutes "success" and in influencing our own personal satisfaction with the hunt.
I would love to see more emphasis on "how I killed it" versus "what I killed". It's the process, not the end result, that really matters (to me anyway).
Pursuit Hunter said:My favorite quote: "More people will look at the bigger buck, for sure, but the antlers really have nothing to do with your hunting ability".
The current culture of deer hunting is obsessed with antler size. Almost no consideration is given to the skill employed in the kill. I will take greater satisfaction in a doe or average-racked buck that I killed at 20 yards using my knowledge and hard work to get close, over a large-racked buck that happened to wander into an open field 250 yards away. Skill versus luck.
Unfortunately, skill in not a quantifiable commodity. B&C score is. Skill doesnt require the purchase of the latest gadgets and gizmos which fund the hornography that we see every day and that creates the unrealistic expectations that are so rampant.
At its core, hunting is a very personal pursuit. The obsession with quantifying success based on antler score has gotten things all out of whack both in terms of what constitutes "success" and in influencing our own personal satisfaction with the hunt.
I would love to see more emphasis on "how I killed it" versus "what I killed". It's the process, not the end result, that really matters (to me anyway).
Winchester said:Well said!Pursuit Hunter said:My favorite quote: "More people will look at the bigger buck, for sure, but the antlers really have nothing to do with your hunting ability".
The current culture of deer hunting is obsessed with antler size. Almost no consideration is given to the skill employed in the kill. I will take greater satisfaction in a doe or average-racked buck that I killed at 20 yards using my knowledge and hard work to get close, over a large-racked buck that happened to wander into an open field 250 yards away. Skill versus luck.
Unfortunately, skill in not a quantifiable commodity. B&C score is. Skill doesnt require the purchase of the latest gadgets and gizmos which fund the hornography that we see every day and that creates the unrealistic expectations that are so rampant.
At its core, hunting is a very personal pursuit. The obsession with quantifying success based on antler score has gotten things all out of whack both in terms of what constitutes "success" and in influencing our own personal satisfaction with the hunt.
I would love to see more emphasis on "how I killed it" versus "what I killed". It's the process, not the end result, that really matters (to me anyway).
Pursuit Hunter said:My favorite quote: "More people will look at the bigger buck, for sure, but the antlers really have nothing to do with your hunting ability".
The current culture of deer hunting is obsessed with antler size. Almost no consideration is given to the skill employed in the kill. I will take greater satisfaction in a doe or average-racked buck that I killed at 20 yards using my knowledge and hard work to get close, over a large-racked buck that happened to wander into an open field 250 yards away. Skill versus luck.
Unfortunately, skill in not a quantifiable commodity. B&C score is. Skill doesnt require the purchase of the latest gadgets and gizmos which fund the hornography that we see every day and that creates the unrealistic expectations that are so rampant.
At its core, hunting is a very personal pursuit. The obsession with quantifying success based on antler score has gotten things all out of whack both in terms of what constitutes "success" and in influencing our own personal satisfaction with the hunt.
I would love to see more emphasis on "how I killed it" versus "what I killed". It's the process, not the end result, that really matters (to me anyway).
Self filmed YouTube videos are all I enjoy. They feel real and I end up right there with them in the tree.Pursuit Hunter said:On the other hand, I saw a show the other day where a guy was filming his own hunts using a gopro and a camcorder. He talked about why he chose a particular spot. He killed several does in the course of one episode. He was happy. I enjoyed it because it felt like he had earned those deer..
BSK said:Great post Pursuit Hunter. I couldn't agree more.
If I ever get the chance to meet the author of that article (Chris Eberhart) I'm going to shake his hand and say "THANK YOU for a great article and a much needed dose of reality!"
I agree. I would add "why were you hunting that particular spot?" to the important facts surrounding the hunt. An explanation that involves some knowledge of deer behavior and woodsmanship impresses me much more than the size of the antlers. Not that impressing me matters to anyone but me, just sayin...Bottom Hunter said:I tend to be wary of big deer without a story behind it....
To me, where, when and how is always more interesting than what.
Pursuit Hunter said:I agree. I would add "why were you hunting that particular spot?" to the important facts surrounding the hunt. An explanation that involves some knowledge of deer behavior and woodsmanship impresses me much more than the size of the antlers. Not that impressing me matters to anyone but me, just sayin...Bottom Hunter said:I tend to be wary of big deer without a story behind it....
To me, where, when and how is always more interesting than what.