I have mounted several scopes in the last few months very good results....and one issue that leaves me scratching my head.
I bought the wheeler scope mounting kit. I heard the "level level level" kit is junk, and tend to agree, it will only fit the action of one of my rifles anyway. The gouge I got was that having the top of the scope level with the chamber does not mean the reticle is aligned with the bore, which is what assures proper reticle alignment. For that I was advised that this EXD instrument is the ticket:
http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=6097 ... INSTRUMENT
My dilema is this. I have a model 70, and when I use the EXD to adjust the reticle, and then peer through the scope with my cheek weld, it appears the reticle is canted, which I can adjust my shifting my grip on the rifle. It just looks a little off. And the "level level level" indicates the chamber and scope are not level when the EXD indicates it's properly aligned. One of the two is way off.
Which do I trust....the level level level and my look through the scope, or the EXD?
I bought the wheeler scope mounting kit. I heard the "level level level" kit is junk, and tend to agree, it will only fit the action of one of my rifles anyway. The gouge I got was that having the top of the scope level with the chamber does not mean the reticle is aligned with the bore, which is what assures proper reticle alignment. For that I was advised that this EXD instrument is the ticket:
http://www.brownells.com/.aspx/pid=6097 ... INSTRUMENT
My dilema is this. I have a model 70, and when I use the EXD to adjust the reticle, and then peer through the scope with my cheek weld, it appears the reticle is canted, which I can adjust my shifting my grip on the rifle. It just looks a little off. And the "level level level" indicates the chamber and scope are not level when the EXD indicates it's properly aligned. One of the two is way off.
Which do I trust....the level level level and my look through the scope, or the EXD?