Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
UT fans must be a little nervous.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scioto" data-source="post: 4133066" data-attributes="member: 12310"><p>Riiiiiight. Your use of the English language is too proficient for me to believe that deep down your brain actually believes anything in that post you just wrote. </p><p></p><p>I guess that's why the Committee used their "funny math" to rank Ohio State ahead of Stanford and Iowa. Oh wait, they didn't. Then, I guess it's because Stanford and Iowa have a greater "brand value" than the defending national champions Ohio State. No, that's not it either.</p><p></p><p> I prefer to take Long at his word that a 13th game in both of their cases and a conf championship in the case of Stanford justified ranking both teams higher than Ohio State. And he's correct. Applying that same logic to Alabama, in the absence of the Arkansas 4th and 25 miracle, your team's appearance in the CFP has as much to do with luck as it does with on-field accomplishment. </p><p></p><p>The same can be said for Sparty. Had ttun's punter not fumbled the snap ...... </p><p></p><p>There could just be such a karmic convergence in Jerry Land on Dec 31 that I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that place for fear that everything and everyone could vaporize into thin air at any moment. The two luckiest teams in all of this season's college football will be going at it. Who woulda thunk it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scioto, post: 4133066, member: 12310"] Riiiiiight. Your use of the English language is too proficient for me to believe that deep down your brain actually believes anything in that post you just wrote. I guess that's why the Committee used their "funny math" to rank Ohio State ahead of Stanford and Iowa. Oh wait, they didn't. Then, I guess it's because Stanford and Iowa have a greater "brand value" than the defending national champions Ohio State. No, that's not it either. I prefer to take Long at his word that a 13th game in both of their cases and a conf championship in the case of Stanford justified ranking both teams higher than Ohio State. And he's correct. Applying that same logic to Alabama, in the absence of the Arkansas 4th and 25 miracle, your team's appearance in the CFP has as much to do with luck as it does with on-field accomplishment. The same can be said for Sparty. Had ttun's punter not fumbled the snap ...... There could just be such a karmic convergence in Jerry Land on Dec 31 that I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that place for fear that everything and everyone could vaporize into thin air at any moment. The two luckiest teams in all of this season's college football will be going at it. Who woulda thunk it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
UT fans must be a little nervous.....
Top