^^^ Makes sense, but is it spelled out any where? Also, is the word "bonus" used anywhere? I'm not seeing any of this in the printed H&T Guide, or online at the TWRA CWD website.TNGunsmoke":241azlwv said:My thought would be that statewide tag gets burned before bonus tags in CWD unit. My thought process is that it's a bonus tag and can't be filled until the first two are burned.
Dittorecurve60#":3qz6gdzq said:Read the hunting guide. Wasn't confusing to me at all.
Agreed on not being confusing, but it is seriously lacking on details concerning "earned buck tags". Enough that one could play out several scenarios in his/her head and move forward in err without any ill intentions.recurve60#":3imhk2uk said:Read the hunting guide. Wasn't confusing to me at all.
Andy S.":2by2yfp7 said:docpoco - I share some of your viewpoints, and have discussed a lot of your scenarios, as well as other scenarios, with a lot of hunters who hunt both Unit CWD and Unit L, on the fringes of Unit CWD.
Due to the way the regs read, my minimum requirement for a Unit CWD buck have slightly increased as I don't want to burn a "statewide" buck tag (good in all 95 counties) on a Unit CWD buck, knowing there are ways to "earn" two additional Unit CWD buck tags.
Due to this, my two "statewide" buck tags will be just as coveted as always, if not more.
Here's the question I want answered:
You start off the season with TWO STATEWIDE buck tags, good in all 95 counties.
You kill two does in Unit CWD, get them tested, then earn an additional "UNIT CWD" buck tag that can only be used in Unit CWD.
You kill a buck in the future in Unit CWD, at which point you have two statewide buck tags and one Unit CWD buck tag available for use. Which "buck tag" do you punch at that point? Can I use my recently acquired "Unit CWD" buck tag, since I can earn another one, and hang on to my more coveted "STATEWIDE" buck tags?
In other words, is there any SPECIFIC order thar your buck tags must be punched, if you have both kinds available and you kill a buck in Unit CWD.
megalomaniac":31wjlsnx said:Andy, I suspect they had not even thought of the order buck tags would be used when the new regulations were established.
Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk
I'd like to think you are right, but I can assure you if I ask five different wardens, I will get three different answers, thus why I have called Region One and HQ and left messages for further clarification.MAGA":2tpfzp2j said:Andy S.":2tpfzp2j said:docpoco - I share some of your viewpoints, and have discussed a lot of your scenarios, as well as other scenarios, with a lot of hunters who hunt both Unit CWD and Unit L, on the fringes of Unit CWD.
Due to the way the regs read, my minimum requirement for a Unit CWD buck have slightly increased as I don't want to burn a "statewide" buck tag (good in all 95 counties) on a Unit CWD buck, knowing there are ways to "earn" two additional Unit CWD buck tags.
Due to this, my two "statewide" buck tags will be just as coveted as always, if not more.
Here's the question I want answered:
You start off the season with TWO STATEWIDE buck tags, good in all 95 counties.
You kill two does in Unit CWD, get them tested, then earn an additional "UNIT CWD" buck tag that can only be used in Unit CWD.
You kill a buck in the future in Unit CWD, at which point you have two statewide buck tags and one Unit CWD buck tag available for use. Which "buck tag" do you punch at that point? Can I use my recently acquired "Unit CWD" buck tag, since I can earn another one, and hang on to my more coveted "STATEWIDE" buck tags?
In other words, is there any SPECIFIC order thar your buck tags must be punched, if you have both kinds available and you kill a buck in Unit CWD.
It's obvious that you would tag your CWD unit buck with a CWD buck tag. The assumption your premise relies on is that the two tags compete with each other, which is not the case. Since there is no order (i.e. sequence) in which one is required to use each tag stated within the regulations, then order is of no consequence, rather geography is what matters.
Agree 100%.megalomaniac":1bwajwpb said:Andy, I suspect they had not even thought of the order buck tags would be used when the new regulations were established.
Andy S.":2kzsyu3e said:I'd like to think you are right, but I can assure you if I ask five different wardens, I will get three different answers, thus why I have called Region One and HQ and left messages for further clarification.MAGA":2kzsyu3e said:Andy S.":2kzsyu3e said:docpoco - I share some of your viewpoints, and have discussed a lot of your scenarios, as well as other scenarios, with a lot of hunters who hunt both Unit CWD and Unit L, on the fringes of Unit CWD.
Due to the way the regs read, my minimum requirement for a Unit CWD buck have slightly increased as I don't want to burn a "statewide" buck tag (good in all 95 counties) on a Unit CWD buck, knowing there are ways to "earn" two additional Unit CWD buck tags.
Due to this, my two "statewide" buck tags will be just as coveted as always, if not more.
Here's the question I want answered:
You start off the season with TWO STATEWIDE buck tags, good in all 95 counties.
You kill two does in Unit CWD, get them tested, then earn an additional "UNIT CWD" buck tag that can only be used in Unit CWD.
You kill a buck in the future in Unit CWD, at which point you have two statewide buck tags and one Unit CWD buck tag available for use. Which "buck tag" do you punch at that point? Can I use my recently acquired "Unit CWD" buck tag, since I can earn another one, and hang on to my more coveted "STATEWIDE" buck tags?
In other words, is there any SPECIFIC order thar your buck tags must be punched, if you have both kinds available and you kill a buck in Unit CWD.
It's obvious that you would tag your CWD unit buck with a CWD buck tag. The assumption your premise relies on is that the two tags compete with each other, which is not the case. Since there is no order (i.e. sequence) in which one is required to use each tag stated within the regulations, then order is of no consequence, rather geography is what matters.
I could not agree more.docpoco":3evn5hrg said:It's a direct contradiction.
Other than Shelby County recently, which was no surprise, I have not heard of any more positives detected in other "new" counties. With that said, the CWD testing system is "jammed" at the moment so to speak, due to so many samples being submitted, so a lot of results are still in "pending" status awaiting final results. Time will tell.Realtree56":yfjts6f7 said:A little off subject, but have anymore cases been found in new areas? I've kept an eye out,fearing it's spread, but haven't seen any news to suggest it has.