Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

Rob-HC Hunter

Well-Known Member
Bronze Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
756
Made my first trail cam pull thus weekend on my primary farm in preparation for the upcoming season. This is the best deer so far. I thought it would be cool to get opinions on the age, score and if you would harvest..

5 1/2
150"+ (deer in the back [emoji1])
Yes (pass on the 9 point)

66ec5a0236898fccb6c834e80ba424b6.jpg



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

5.5 +, mid 140's if there is a G2 hiding on his right side mite break 150. And yes I would shoot
 
Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Thanks guys. The best way officially score him is to get him on the ground.!!!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Velvet adds 10" in my opinion and it's hard to pinpoint age in the summer. I think he's 140" and 4.5+


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

mattmillard510":2ehq48up said:
Velvet adds 10" in my opinion and it's hard to pinpoint age in the summer. I think he's 140" and 4.5+


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would agree that the velvet makes them look big. It's also tough to get perspective from a camera. I think that deer will carry his mass when out of velvet and he has tremendous tine length. Plus he was well away from the camera when the picture was taken.

Anyone dare to take a stab at what the deer in the back scored in the picture below? He was actually harvested the same year as the photo during rifle season chasing a doe.

30a80f68031c41a50f9eea5af674f872.jpg





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Rob-HC Hunter":3ew7iho6 said:
mattmillard510":3ew7iho6 said:
Velvet adds 10" in my opinion and it's hard to pinpoint age in the summer. I think he's 140" and 4.5+


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would agree that the velvet makes them look big. It's also tough to get perspective from a camera. I think that deer will carry his mass when out of velvet and he has tremendous tine length. Plus he was well away from the camera when the picture was taken.

Anyone dare to take a stab at what the deer in the back scored in the picture below? He was actually harvested the same year as the photo during rifle season chasing a doe.

30a80f68031c41a50f9eea5af674f872.jpg





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

147"??
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

The guy who killed this deer scored him multiple times at 177" gross. He scored high due to mass and was as a mainframe 10 point with two additional points (kicker off the left side you can't see). He was over 6" at the base and his other circumference measurements were all 5". My initial thought was that he would do 160" he doesn't look like 170+ deer.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

145" on the buck killed. I'd say about the same on this year's buck. Great mass and tine length. Did anyone kill the 2014 buck with the screwy right beam?
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Rob-HC Hunter":1529xjhn said:
The guy who killed this deer scored him multiple times at 177" gross.
WOW! :shock: That is right at 180" which I have a hard time believing. I would like to see his score sheet. With that said, that is just one pic and sometimes that one pic don't tell the full story. Nice buck nonetheless, congrats to the fortunate hunter who got him. Was he killed in TN?
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Rob-HC Hunter":uyxhgze6 said:
He was over 6" at the base and his other circumference measurements were all 5".
If he truly had 40"+ of mass, then I can see a 170"+ score. With that said, I have only see a handful of TN bucks that approached/exceeded 40" of mass and their unusually large circumferences were real easy to see, not so much in the pic above.
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Mike Belt":2c623esn said:
145" on the buck killed. I'd say about the same on this year's buck. Great mass and tine length. Did anyone kill the 2014 buck with the screwy right beam?

I had hundreds of pictures of that buck (Torch) during the summer that year. He was seen by the guy I hunt with twice during early bow season and we never seen him again or got a picture of him since. I think he moved off the farm that year after a doe and was likely killed or poached.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Andy S.":1w0fvv0e said:
Rob-HC Hunter":1w0fvv0e said:
The guy who killed this deer scored him multiple times at 177" gross.
WOW! :shock: That is right at 180" which I have a hard time believing. I would like to see his score sheet. With that said, that is just one pic and sometimes that one pic don't tell the full story. Nice buck nonetheless, congrats to the fortunate hunter who got him. Was he killed in TN?

Yes he was killed in TN in a county bordering Kentucky.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

140

Hard to judge from a single pic. Even harder in velvet. Awesome buck, regardless.
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

muddyboots":2ggfu7o9 said:
5 1/2
146
Thanks muddy boots. Are you referring to the first picture?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

ROUGH COUNTRY HUNTER":3g5alym8 said:
150 easy.Very long tines

That's what I was thinking his tine length is impressive. That's why I thought he would do 150.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Strict":2zw2uvsr said:
140

Hard to judge from a single pic. Even harder in velvet. Awesome buck, regardless.

I agree. The best way to score him is on the tailgate of my truck!!!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Re: Trail Camera Pictures Analysis

Pulled cards today and picked up this solid 8 point.

4.5 years old
135+ (he will be close to 140 but not quite)
Yes - I'd shoot him in a heartbeat. I have an affinity for big 8 pointers


82abcff3ac16f48beae93ff549712cff.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Latest posts

Back
Top