Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
TN vs Purdue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DayDay" data-source="post: 5880813" data-attributes="member: 9643"><p>Any time the word "intent" is used for help in determining a violation, it will lead to subjectivity. Refs have always used this when they think a player has violated the 3-second lane violation but is making an effort to get out of the lane and will give him the benefit.</p><p></p><p>I suspect (hope) the rule for NCAA men will be changed soon and require both feet to be on the floor out of the lane before resetting the count. I don't think Edey will handle the wider lane or bigger athletes in the NBA well.</p><p></p><p>There are so many things the ref has to take into account which can reset the count on the three-second lane violation (e.g. a deflected or tipped pass that is still controlled by the offensive team is still considered a "loose ball" at that moment and this will reset the count.) Also, the ref doesn't always start the count as soon as possible. This is probably why the 3-second lane violation doesn't get called a lot even when it should.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DayDay, post: 5880813, member: 9643"] Any time the word "intent" is used for help in determining a violation, it will lead to subjectivity. Refs have always used this when they think a player has violated the 3-second lane violation but is making an effort to get out of the lane and will give him the benefit. I suspect (hope) the rule for NCAA men will be changed soon and require both feet to be on the floor out of the lane before resetting the count. I don't think Edey will handle the wider lane or bigger athletes in the NBA well. There are so many things the ref has to take into account which can reset the count on the three-second lane violation (e.g. a deflected or tipped pass that is still controlled by the offensive team is still considered a "loose ball" at that moment and this will reset the count.) Also, the ref doesn't always start the count as soon as possible. This is probably why the 3-second lane violation doesn't get called a lot even when it should. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic TN Forums
Sports talk
TN vs Purdue
Top