At the end of the day, the whole reason we have this system was because you'd have a couple teams arguably good enough to be in the title game. Those few teams are the only ones who should be entitled to be in the playoffs. The rest of these are only here because of compromises between leagues to get agreement on the format. 80% of these teams haven't done enough to deserve a shot at the championship as a matter of right.I don't like the 5 conference champions getting in. I think BYU got screwed.
Time to go on a run! RTR!!!![]()
I like the matchup against Oklahoma and a chance to get some redemption. At one point in the 3rd quarter ALABAMA had made a comeback and had taken the lead in that game. Alot of people are NOT giving ALABAMA credit for that and are making a big deal that ALABAMA lost that game by 3 points. But we lost.I don't like the 5 conference champions getting in. I think BYU got screwed.
Time to go on a run! RTR!!!![]()
That's what I disagree with. I don't think Tulane and JMU deserve to be there (I get they do in this system).At the end of the day, the whole reason we have this system was because you'd have a couple teams arguably good enough to be in the title game. Those few teams are the only ones who should be entitled to be in the playoffs. The rest of these are only here because of compromises between leagues to get agreement on the format. 80% of these teams haven't done enough to deserve a shot at the championship as a matter of right.
They absolutely don't belong but if we're being honest no more than 4 or 5 teams deserve to be there, if that many.That's what I disagree with. I don't think Tulane and JMU deserve to be there (I get they do in this system).
I disagree with automatically giving those G5 teams a spot.
He made that comment less than a minute after explaining that BYU was "demoted" due to how they played in their championship game.Hunter Yurachek was just on ESPN explaining all of this. As to ALABAMA getting in with a 10-3 record he explained they did not take in any consideration it's post season play. That it took in its strength of schedule and he particularly mention the wins against Georgia Vandy and tn when making their decision.
No one is going to get past this bracket. So what does it matter ????
Hunter makes no sense. If that is the case then why does a conference championship win matter but a loss gets a slide?Hunter Yurachek was just on ESPN explaining all of this. As to ALABAMA getting in with a 10-3 record he explained they did not take in any consideration it's post season play. That it took in its strength of schedule and he particularly mention the wins against Georgia Vandy and tn when making their decision.
Summeral didn't leave for a rival in the same conference.So Two Lane is gonna let Summeral come back from Florida Gators and coach the Chamionship run. And Ole Miss is not letting Kiffin . What a world we live in.
AgreeEven more salt to the wound for this Vandy fan. The powers that be thinking Tulane and JMU are of the top 12 teams in the country. Letting people in because they are at the top of their conference even though they are playing high school games. I'm just about done with college football. It's just so screwed up now
Exactly... in most years, only 4, 5, or 6 teams will have a legit argument who is the best...They absolutely don't belong but if we're being honest no more than 4 or 5 teams deserve to be there, if that many.
That FSU loss was arguably the worst of any team in the top 25.I'm not sure how but there is one team that got in to the cfp that lost against a 5-7 team, barely won by the skin of their teeth against a 4-8 team, would've lost against another 5-7 team if not for a couple questionable calls at the very end. They also lost at home again and got absolutely beat in their conference championship game. Yea that's for sure who I've got going in to the playoff it's only fair. Makes sense
They deserve to be left out,join a conference and play some one besides cream puffsNotre Dame is left out.