scn":254tegie said:
The best recommendation would be to not do it.
There are a lot of management activities out there that will give you a lot more bang for your buck, (pun intended), than supplemental feeding.
So very true.
IMO, there are two things that will typically provide more broadly utilized benefits than supplemental feeding, and at a fraction the monetary costs, and at much less "risk" of doing more harm than good.
1. Bush-hogging and/or mowing lots of scattered areas around your land, at least once annually. IMO, if done only once annually, the best time to do this is the month of February.
2. Purchase and scatter lime on those mowed areas (as well as any areas you sow in something for the wildlife). Lime may not be as needed in all places, but I've seen few areas in TN where it wasn't of good benefit for the money.
Other managers will point out that cutting trees (just something that allows more sunlight to hit the ground) is paramount. But this is not always an option, while most do have plenty of scattered places they could mow and lime.
A real key is to make the habitat as diverse as you can, so as to provide year-round and very well distributed food sources (as opposed to the focal point of a feeder). Deer are naturally "browsers", eating most their daily consumption while on the move. If you provide something "better" scattered in many locations, you may provide more of the deer more "supplement" than simply placing a feeder, and again, without the liabilities of concentrated feeding spots, without the harm that could be caused by over-feeding a single item (such as corn) possibly causing deer to consumer less protein (corn has essentially none) when protein is more needed than carbs or fat.
I'm particularly reluctant to use corn (in a feeder or poured on the ground) as a supplemental food source. Even though corn is the lowest cost item you can purchase for use in a feeder, it can be very expensive, especially if your time, extra gas, plus special trips to purchase and pour are factored.
Lastly, I really believe few consider the harm to the manager's ultimate goals that may be caused by increased predation at "feeding spots", as it's my opinion that more of this increased predation is particularly on button bucks.