I recently tried the 250 grain Shock Waves in my MZ and they shot really good. Just wondering if anyone had used the 300 grain Shock Wave and how did it perform on deer?
I've shot mine the last couple of mornings while it was cool. Due to the lack of a range in my area, I am forced to shoot in the big hayfields where I hunt. Usually every other weekend, but here lately, I've been kinda obsessin' over 100 yard groups and how to tighten them.Matador said:Guys, I've shot a couple of my MZ loaders 3-4 times already.I try to shoot at least once every couple of weeks.
I'm wanting to try the bonded shockwaves. I hear they hold up a bit better when bone is encountered.I used the Shockwave 250gr. during 2004 season. They shot well outta my Remington 700ml. I killed a big buck with them during the late mz season, but was kindly disappointed. My first shot hit the deer in the spine, followed closely by a second. I didn't get an exit on either shot. I don't know if the backbone splintered the bullets or what, but I didn't like it.
GRAMPS said:I recently tried the 250 grain Shock Waves in my MZ and they shot really good. Just wondering if anyone had used the 300 grain Shock Wave and how did it perform on deer?
So far, accuracy-wise, the Barnes spit fire (245grain) have made a believer out of me!Model70Man said:Barnes Spitfire.......no substitute.
Used to use the Shockwave but they were so hard to load in my
Encore. Switched to the Barnes and haven't looked back.
BZ911 said:the shockwaves in the 300 grain w/ 10 grains of 777 shoot well in my encore but I still have a lack of blood trail issue.I lost a nice buck last season .no blood sign at all. I hope I missed him but not at that range.I did not see him for the rest of the season. I had one doe go around 40 yards without a blood trail. A good buddy has shoot several with the 250 grain and had the same issues.