Hell just imagine if the freaking defense could tackle!! Just that simple, tackle. Wrap them up. Take them down.Imagine if we had run defense and a place kicker.
I guess stats and data are irrelevant if Stephen A Smith disagrees with them.Not even close
Try the whole NCAA
https://www.si.com/fannation/colleg...-college-football-heisman-trophy-front-runner
Josh Pate went into great Detail about how ALABAMA is coaching and after hearing him out I feel better about the way ALABAMA is playing. Take a listen and see if you don't agree.I thought this thread was going to be about Ty Simpson.
Aguilar is really good. I do think Ty is the best qb in the league but Aguilar is right there. If Alabama had any kind of running game that offense would be really tough.
Josh Pate went into great Detail about how ALABAMA is coaching and after hearing him out I feel better about the way ALABAMA is playing. Take a listen and see if you don't agree.
I usta think that, the tide would be good a year or two then fade away but the transfer thing has upended that idea. It levels out programs and has ended the building of long term winning. Look at Tennessee, in the past we'd be stuck with Nico or playing a freshman, instead because of the transfer we've got the best qb in the league and the most potent offense. Next year MSU could or even Fla. Now you just go buy the wins.Alabama will be fine because they have a bunch of players that know how to play football. They're still playing with Saban's players. Even if DeBoer ends up being a horrible coach, they'll still be a good ball team for the next few seasons. If he does well, they'll continue to be a playoff caliber team for years to come.
As long as a program has a stable of boosters with deep pockets, they should be competitive. Frankly I'm surprised the Texas teams are struggling so badly considering the oil money in those parts. You'd expect they'd be trying to bring back a program like SMU before they got the death penalty.I usta think that, the tide would be good a year or two then fade away but the transfer thing has upended that idea. It levels out programs and has ended the building of long term winning. Look at Tennessee, in the past we'd be stuck with Nico or playing a freshman, instead because of the transfer we've got the best qb in the league and the most potent offense. Next year MSU could or even Fla. Now you just go buy the wins.
That said I still think the transfer deal and nil isn't good for college ball but everybody is playing( or cheating) by the same rules so![]()
Ur leaving out the fact that DeBoerAlabama will be fine because they have a bunch of players that know how to play football. They're still playing with Saban's players. Even if DeBoer ends up being a horrible coach, they'll still be a good ball team for the next few seasons. If he does well, they'll continue to be a playoff caliber team for years to come.
Stands to reason. Arch Manning road the pine behind Quinn Ewers all this time. And lets face it Quinn turned out to be over hyped and over rated. There was a reason he went 7th round 231st pick in the NFL. I am sure Arch will flourish in the NFL though. All those Manning Boys seem to be late bloomers.As long as a program has a stable of boosters with deep pockets, they should be competitive. Frankly I'm surprised the Texas teams are struggling so badly considering the oil money in those parts. You'd expect they'd be trying to bring back a program like SMU before they got the death penalty.
You're such a goober. I believe in the seven seasons between the two Mannings in the NCAA, they had a combined record of 5-2 against your beloved tyde. Check the receipts you idiot. I believe that's a little over 0.700 winning percentage if I use my crayons right.Stands to reason. Arch Manning road the pine behind Quinn Ewers all this time. And lets face it Quinn turned out to be over hyped and over rated. There was a reason he went 7th round 231st pick in the NFL. I am sure Arch will flourish in the NFL though. All those Manning Boys seem to be late bloomers.
It's Stephen A. MythI guess stats and data are irrelevant if Stephen A Smith disagrees with them.![]()
Late as in sophomores? Waiting till then to stomp a mudhole in bama?All those Manning Boys seem to be late bloomers.
Anybody would take a win over stats, but the topic was best QB. Not best team. It's a team game and you can't pin a loss on one player.Im going against the grain here but I'd take the W over the stat! I'm also going to say it takes more than a quarterback to win.
The problem in any head to head comparison with Aguilar is the other guy gets to play against UT's defense which is unfortunately like Swiss cheese this year…
At one time he woulda had a hard time back in Tennessee in a kidding way most of the time and not so much some of the time but those days are in the past. It's about money nowadays.Simpson is a great quarterback. He's a coaches kid from the great state of Tennessee . I'd bet he will be great on Sundays too. It's ashamed a great player from Tennessee is helping the red algae be successful.
I question that as well. You could see the receivers getting frustrated with Milroe but they never made the change.But, Simpson has definitely shown to be top level. He has shined in some pressure situations, and has earned his recognition. I question why he didn't replace Milroe last year.
Ackshually Aguilar is still the best…see here:This did not age well.
Those stats are sure gonna look Purdy in that trophy case. Yall sure u got room ?