Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New Trophy's
New trophy room comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Classifieds
Trophy Room
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest updates
Latest reviews
Author list
Series list
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
Score?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ski" data-source="post: 5698942" data-attributes="member: 20583"><p>Funny you say that. Here's a buck that looks quite similar that scored dang near 160". I scored him again after drying all winter and he still hit 158". I think in order to settle the dispute with your buddy, one of you are gona have to put that buck down. </p><p></p><p>Your buck looks bigger than 135" and I believe it probably is. When I roughed the score in my head using average measurements of most deer I kill, I gave him 85" length, 28" mass, and 17" spread for an even 130". That said, it's about what I had the buck below at as well until I shot him. Trail cameras can be deceiving, especially at night and even worse in velvet. Body size also greatly influences what the rack looks like and trail cameras don't show that. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]191839[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]191840[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ski, post: 5698942, member: 20583"] Funny you say that. Here's a buck that looks quite similar that scored dang near 160". I scored him again after drying all winter and he still hit 158". I think in order to settle the dispute with your buddy, one of you are gona have to put that buck down. Your buck looks bigger than 135" and I believe it probably is. When I roughed the score in my head using average measurements of most deer I kill, I gave him 85" length, 28" mass, and 17" spread for an even 130". That said, it's about what I had the buck below at as well until I shot him. Trail cameras can be deceiving, especially at night and even worse in velvet. Body size also greatly influences what the rack looks like and trail cameras don't show that. [ATTACH type="full"]191839[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full"]191840[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Tennessee Hunting Forums
Trail Cams & Pic's
Score?
Top