Reduced limit ?

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

Bgoodman30

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
2,883
I find it surprising that so many hunters are in favor of reducing our limit of 4. I think it might be beneficial in some counties but others can sustain. I know it's logical that fewer birds taken means more for next year but I need proof?

I am hearing a few more gobblers this year and they certainly have more hens but I find it probably has little to do with last years take..

Is there any hard data out there from other states that shows that reducing the limit increased hunter success? Better average kill per man day? Proven to help population rebound?





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
The number of gobblers killed is far less important than when they are killed biologically.

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk
 
megalomaniac":1sri80sc said:
The number of gobblers killed is far less important than when they are killed biologically.

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk

And how they are killed, which are killed, and how many are killed that way
 
I'm a non-resident, but I'll give an example of how a reduced limit would have helped keep me from killing a bird the other day.

Struck a bird on my way out. Circled around and got on his point, nothing. As I'm standing there wondering where the bird went, I hear yelping in the hollow below me. Then all out BRAWLING! I ease towards it and can see two gobblers going at it full throttle. I just walk up, gun ready, and see three male turkey off to the side that are jakes. They see me and start easing off while the brawlers keep going at it. Once they stop, I see one big red head, half-puffed up. And I let him have it! Jake.

With a 2 or 3 bird limit, really good chance I wouldn't have pulled the trigger seeing as how I already had 1 tom for the season. Is leaving a jake out there going to bolster populations across the landscape. Nope. But that is not the intention. However, if you start leaving more males on the landscape to carry over into the next spring, it can very well increase hunt quality and hunter satisfaction. Those two aspects are highly correlated with hearing a gobble and if you carryover more male birds to the next spring..You get where I am going. There may be some modeling research in the works seeing how many gobblers/how many springs of an increased gobbler carryover it takes to potentially have an impact.

Gobbler carryover is one reason why some states have such great hunting even 2-years after lackluster hatches.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Yes, the limit is too high. Some people don't have enough sense or the resources to keep from over harvesting a spot. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE hunting turkeys and part of hunting is killing. Ive killed my limit every year since 1989 and will continue to do so BUT I spread it out and don't over harvest any of the places I hunt. We have one property that's roughly 800ac. It used to be loaded with birds but the last 4 years its way down. I let 1 bird be taken off it last year, this year Im not letting ANY be taken. Ive still got birds there and Im planning on keeping it that way. Ive been hunting these things since 1984. Ive seen it go from ZERO birds anywhere within 50 miles to birds everywhere, to not many anywhere now. I plan on keeping some around if possible.
Ive hunted as many as 6 states in a spring before and the limit in TN is higher than ANYWHERE else Ive ever hunted. FL, 2. KY, 2. TN, 4. MI, 1, KS, 2. NE, 3. See a pattern here?
 
^^^^Read the last 4 posts and take them to the bank. Those guys, along with many others, can traditionally hunt and kill them as good as anyone. With that that said, they see and understand the importance of conservation over killing. Leave SOME seed for breeding at the end of season and for carryover. As OP stated, SOME areas can sustain the current 4 bird limit (mainly Region 2, no surprise there), but MANY others should currently have a 1-2 bird limit. No all areas, not even the majority, but some are really in dire straits. Also, several other southeastern states are being proactive by reducing bag limits, pushing opener back a week or two, limiting NR tags, and staggering the weeks in which residents and NR can kill turkeys (spreading the killing out over weeks instead of the massive front loaded kill accompanied with an early opener). Bottom line, conservation and sustaining a quality hunting experience over time should be every turkey hunter's primary goal.
 
Hunting is a tool across many species to reduce populations. It works and that is why it is done. Google and read as much as you like.

Turkeys have many natural factors that effect their population. A high limit and negative natural factors can be very impactful to populations. The limit needs to be reduced to allow for a buffer for the natural events.

Just like deer numbers are different across the state, so are the turkey numbers. There is currently no plan in place to improve things and that is disturbing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
th88":1ifs8ddg said:
I'm a non-resident, but I'll give an example of how a reduced limit would have helped keep me from killing a bird the other day.

Struck a bird on my way out. Circled around and got on his point, nothing. As I'm standing there wondering where the bird went, I hear yelping in the hollow below me. Then all out BRAWLING! I ease towards it and can see two gobblers going at it full throttle. I just walk up, gun ready, and see three male turkey off to the side that are jakes. They see me and start easing off while the brawlers keep going at it. Once they stop, I see one big red head, half-puffed up. And I let him have it! Jake.

With a 2 or 3 bird limit, really good chance I wouldn't have pulled the trigger seeing as how I already had 1 tom for the season. Is leaving a jake out there going to bolster populations across the landscape. Nope. But that is not the intention. However, if you start leaving more males on the landscape to carry over into the next spring, it can very well increase hunt quality and hunter satisfaction. Those two aspects are highly correlated with hearing a gobble and if you carryover more male birds to the next spring..You get where I am going. There may be some modeling research in the works seeing how many gobblers/how many springs of an increased gobbler carryover it takes to potentially have an impact.

Gobbler carryover is one reason why some states have such great hunting even 2-years after lackluster hatches.

It's certainly logical and it certainly can increase hunt quality and satisfaction but will it?

I'm an avid turkey hunter obviously and in 2019 my season would have been finished at 6:45 am Sunday morning. I am not sure I would have been very "satisfied" sitting out the rest of TN spring season....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Huntaholic":3vh23c3j said:
Yes, the limit is too high. Some people don't have enough sense or the resources to keep from over harvesting a spot. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE hunting turkeys and part of hunting is killing. Ive killed my limit every year since 1989 and will continue to do so BUT I spread it out and don't over harvest any of the places I hunt. We have one property that's roughly 800ac. It used to be loaded with birds but the last 4 years its way down. I let 1 bird be taken off it last year, this year Im not letting ANY be taken. Ive still got birds there and Im planning on keeping it that way. Ive been hunting these things since 1984. Ive seen it go from ZERO birds anywhere within 50 miles to birds everywhere, to not many anywhere now. I plan on keeping some around if possible.
Ive hunted as many as 6 states in a spring before and the limit in TN is higher than ANYWHERE else Ive ever hunted. FL, 2. KY, 2. TN, 4. MI, 1, KS, 2. NE, 3. See a pattern here?

Wow quite an accomplishment! What area?
I'm usually good for at least 3 or more a season. I've never killed more than 2 off the same farm. Honestly I rarely hear about someone killing their limit of 4 off one farm or even WMA? Used too but not anymore?

I agree I hunt some farms that used to be loaded that are now not... I also hunt some spots that have seen little to no change and still have plenty of birds..

I see your pattern but also noticed most of those states have regional distribution of turkeys. Not as widespread as TN.

I don't disagree the reduced limit may help but I fear it might be all for naught... And if the population rebounds I doubt they will raise it back... Just hate to see us lose any more freedoms in this country...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
bloodtrailing":1qyvizwt said:
Hunting is a tool across many species to reduce populations. It works and that is why it is done. Google and read as much as you like.

Turkeys have many natural factors that effect their population. A high limit and negative natural factors can be very impactful to populations. The limit needs to be reduced to allow for a buffer for the natural events.

Just like deer numbers are different across the state, so are the turkey numbers. There is currently no plan in place to improve things and that is disturbing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Definitely think the limit should be different for turkeys by region or county.

Good example with the deer limit it's 3 a day in unit L. Virtually unlimited... But is the deer population decimated? No because most CAN'T and WONT kill that many...

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Huntaholic":2ymd6wse said:
Yes, the limit is too high. Some people don't have enough sense or the resources to keep from over harvesting a spot. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE hunting turkeys and part of hunting is killing. Ive killed my limit every year since 1989 and will continue to do so BUT I spread it out and don't over harvest any of the places I hunt. We have one property that's roughly 800ac. It used to be loaded with birds but the last 4 years its way down. I let 1 bird be taken off it last year, this year Im not letting ANY be taken. Ive still got birds there and Im planning on keeping it that way. Ive been hunting these things since 1984. Ive seen it go from ZERO birds anywhere within 50 miles to birds everywhere, to not many anywhere now. I plan on keeping some around if possible.
Ive hunted as many as 6 states in a spring before and the limit in TN is higher than ANYWHERE else Ive ever hunted. FL, 2. KY, 2. TN, 4. MI, 1, KS, 2. NE, 3. See a pattern here?

Also in a few of these states you can harvest them all in same day..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Bgoodman30":3n5jj9eu said:
bloodtrailing":3n5jj9eu said:
Hunting is a tool across many species to reduce populations. It works and that is why it is done. Google and read as much as you like.

Turkeys have many natural factors that effect their population. A high limit and negative natural factors can be very impactful to populations. The limit needs to be reduced to allow for a buffer for the natural events.

Just like deer numbers are different across the state, so are the turkey numbers. There is currently no plan in place to improve things and that is disturbing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Okay, let's raise it to 6. If people don't kill 4 then 6 won't matter.

We all know quail are on the rise so let's follow that success story.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
bloodtrailing":r45remcv said:
Bgoodman30":r45remcv said:
bloodtrailing":r45remcv said:
Hunting is a tool across many species to reduce populations. It works and that is why it is done. Google and read as much as you like.

Turkeys have many natural factors that effect their population. A high limit and negative natural factors can be very impactful to populations. The limit needs to be reduced to allow for a buffer for the natural events.

Just like deer numbers are different across the state, so are the turkey numbers. There is currently no plan in place to improve things and that is disturbing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Okay, let's raise it to 6. If people don't kill 4 then 6 won't matter.

We all know quail are on the rise so let's follow that success story.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sounds good!

Everyone knows that over hunting has little to nothing to do with the current state of BW quail!

I believe it's similar with turkey populations! Look at the top harvest counties despite the high harvest rate they reload year after year!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Bgoodman30":34gmf8z6 said:
Definitely think the limit should be different for turkeys by region or county.

Good example with the deer limit it's 3 a day in unit L. Virtually unlimited... But is the deer population decimated? No because most CAN'T and WONT kill that many...

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..

I do not think this idea will work. I started hunting turkeys in 2010 and easily limited out on the same WMA for the first 3 seasons (I couldn't hunt in 2012 for personal reasons). I had more private land by 2014 and still easily limited out for a couple more seasons. As an FYI I didn't even know how to call turkeys, i just bushwhacked them. In 2015 I started learning more about turkeys, calling them and hunting them. It is way more fun to kill one by calling it in and just win the game. Doing so with no decoys is just icing on the cake. That being said, the WMA I used to limit out on easily, still has turkeys, but no where near what it used to have. The main reason is over killing. Most people can't kill 4 anymore no matter where they hunt, because they can't find 4 to kill, because they aren't there anymore. The folks that have healthy populations on several farms, limit out, sometimes regardless of their skill level. The folks that do not have birds anymore do not, also regardless of their skill level.

I rarely hunt deer with a firearm on WMAs anymore, but when I have I have noticed there is a influx of E. TN hunters here in Unit L killing deer, because they can't shoot does, in E. TN at that time or there just aren't as many deer. Get where this going? Making limits by county, zones or what have you will only bring people from the low limit areas to the high limit areas to hunt.

Bgoodman30":34gmf8z6 said:
I don't disagree the reduced limit may help but I fear it might be all for naught... And if the population rebounds I doubt they will raise it back... Just hate to see us lose any more freedoms in this country...

The only thing that the TWRA or TWRC can control is the # of birds we can shoot. The issue with no lowering the limit by law is that if 20% of turkey hunters self limit, and 80% do not, it will be all for naught, so it has to be an imposed limit. I mention this because eventually someone will comment, "If you guys care so much, just self limit..." Remember deer limits have gone up and down many times in the last 30 years or so. Nothing saying if they lowered it to 2 for a few years that we couldn't walk back up to 3.
 
One thing i do not see changing is the NR license issue. Having a non-government funded wildlife agency is good for many reasons, but the area it is not good for is license prices, and obviously funding. Being the TWRA is funded mainly by license sales, they will continue to be chained to NR (higher priced) license sales as part of their life blood.

For the reason i stated above I doubt they will restrict the # sold. I also doubt they will change the opener as this is part of the draw for these folks coming here. I would like to see them lower the limit for NR hunters though. Obviously if we get ours lowered to 2, then you probably wouldn't be able to make NR limit lower, but with the current 4 bird limit, I think the NR limit should be 2.
 
Bone Collector":6caavmfa said:
Bgoodman30":6caavmfa said:
Definitely think the limit should be different for turkeys by region or county.

Good example with the deer limit it's 3 a day in unit L. Virtually unlimited... But is the deer population decimated? No because most CAN'T and WONT kill that many...

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..

I do not think this idea will work. I started hunting turkeys in 2010 and easily limited out on the same WMA for the first 3 seasons (I couldn't hunt in 2012 for personal reasons). I had more private land by 2014 and still easily limited out for a couple more seasons. As an FYI I didn't even know how to call turkeys, i just bushwhacked them. In 2015 I started learning more about turkeys, calling them and hunting them. It is way more fun to kill one by calling it in and just win the game. Doing so with no decoys is just icing on the cake. That being said, the WMA I used to limit out on easily, still has turkeys, but no where near what it used to have. The main reason is over killing. Most people can't kill 4 anymore no matter where they hunt, because they can't find 4 to kill, because they aren't there anymore. The folks that have healthy populations on several farms, limit out, sometimes regardless of their skill level. The folks that do not have birds anymore do not, also regardless of their skill level.

I rarely hunt deer with a firearm on WMAs anymore, but when I have I have noticed there is a influx of E. TN hunters here in Unit L killing deer, because they can't shoot does, in E. TN at that time or there just aren't as many deer. Get where this going? Making limits by county, zones or what have you will only bring people from the low limit areas to the high limit areas to hunt.

Bgoodman30":6caavmfa said:
I don't disagree the reduced limit may help but I fear it might be all for naught... And if the population rebounds I doubt they will raise it back... Just hate to see us lose any more freedoms in this country...

The only thing that the TWRA or TWRC can control is the # of birds we can shoot. The issue with no lowering the limit by law is that if 20% of turkey hunters self limit, and 80% do not, it will be all for naught, so it has to be an imposed limit. I mention this because eventually someone will comment, "If you guys care so much, just self limit..." Remember deer limits have gone up and down many times in the last 30 years or so. Nothing saying if they lowered it to 2 for a few years that we couldn't walk back up to 3.

Yes I agree where is this going!? States like AR reducing OOS days on WMA's for NR for ducks. States reducing limits, dates and tags for NR. TN looking to reduce limits and days we can hunt!

I rarely hunt public but the only bird I've killed this season came off a heavily pressured WMA. I know farms close by that don't get a fraction of the pressure that have far fewer birds than they used too. One of them even larger than the WMA.. Actually the only gobbler I've seen since last Tuesday was on this WMA as I was just driving by and I've hunted everyday.. So I don't believe the pressure is the underlying issue....

Next crappie fisherman will be up in arms to reduce the crappie limit because of all the turkey hunters fishing! All brought to you by turkey HUNTERS! Where is this going!? I like fishing too but I'd rather hunt!
 
Also reduced limits and days can in turn cause much more pressure in shorter period of time.

I don't know if any of y'all have ever fished opening day of red snapper season in AL...?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Bone Collector":192z671m said:
One thing i do not see changing is the NR license issue. Having a non-government funded wildlife agency is good for many reasons, but the area it is not good for is license prices, and obviously funding. Being the TWRA is funded mainly by license sales, they will continue to be chained to NR (higher priced) license sales as part of their life blood.

For the reason i stated above I doubt they will restrict the # sold. I also doubt they will change the opener as this is part of the draw for these folks coming here. I would like to see them lower the limit for NR hunters though. Obviously if we get ours lowered to 2, then you probably wouldn't be able to make NR limit lower, but with the current 4 bird limit, I think the NR limit should be 2.

Right might have a nominal effect but then other states take note and start reducing their NR tags available to TN traveling hunters and others due to increased pressure... Viscous cycle ensues..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Bgoodman30":3fs2euf2 said:
Bone Collector":3fs2euf2 said:
Bgoodman30":3fs2euf2 said:
Definitely think the limit should be different for turkeys by region or county.

Good example with the deer limit it's 3 a day in unit L. Virtually unlimited... But is the deer population decimated? No because most CAN'T and WONT kill that many...

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..

I do not think this idea will work. I started hunting turkeys in 2010 and easily limited out on the same WMA for the first 3 seasons (I couldn't hunt in 2012 for personal reasons). I had more private land by 2014 and still easily limited out for a couple more seasons. As an FYI I didn't even know how to call turkeys, i just bushwhacked them. In 2015 I started learning more about turkeys, calling them and hunting them. It is way more fun to kill one by calling it in and just win the game. Doing so with no decoys is just icing on the cake. That being said, the WMA I used to limit out on easily, still has turkeys, but no where near what it used to have. The main reason is over killing. Most people can't kill 4 anymore no matter where they hunt, because they can't find 4 to kill, because they aren't there anymore. The folks that have healthy populations on several farms, limit out, sometimes regardless of their skill level. The folks that do not have birds anymore do not, also regardless of their skill level.

I rarely hunt deer with a firearm on WMAs anymore, but when I have I have noticed there is a influx of E. TN hunters here in Unit L killing deer, because they can't shoot does, in E. TN at that time or there just aren't as many deer. Get where this going? Making limits by county, zones or what have you will only bring people from the low limit areas to the high limit areas to hunt.

Bgoodman30":3fs2euf2 said:
I don't disagree the reduced limit may help but I fear it might be all for naught... And if the population rebounds I doubt they will raise it back... Just hate to see us lose any more freedoms in this country...

The only thing that the TWRA or TWRC can control is the # of birds we can shoot. The issue with no lowering the limit by law is that if 20% of turkey hunters self limit, and 80% do not, it will be all for naught, so it has to be an imposed limit. I mention this because eventually someone will comment, "If you guys care so much, just self limit..." Remember deer limits have gone up and down many times in the last 30 years or so. Nothing saying if they lowered it to 2 for a few years that we couldn't walk back up to 3.

Yes I agree where is this going!? States like AR reducing OOS days on WMA's for NR for ducks. States reducing limits, dates and tags for NR. TN looking to reduce limits and days we can hunt!

I rarely hunt public but the only bird I've killed this season came off a heavily pressured WMA. I know farms close by that don't get a fraction of the pressure that have far fewer birds than they used too. One of them even larger than the WMA.. Actually the only gobbler I've seen since last Tuesday was on this WMA as I was just driving by and I've hunted everyday.. So I don't believe the pressure is the underlying issue....

Next crappie fisherman will be up in arms to reduce the crappie limit because of all the turkey hunters fishing! All brought to you by turkey HUNTERS! Where is this going!? I like fishing too but I'd rather hunt!
I think your missing my point. I know there are many factors that play into the decline, but limits and season dates are really all we can control.

Either the TWRA has to open more predator trapping/hunting opportunities (perhaps with bounties) or lower hunting limits and season lengths.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Bone Collector":qcpz4a2t said:
Bgoodman30":qcpz4a2t said:
Bone Collector":qcpz4a2t said:
Bgoodman30 said:
Definitely think the limit should be different for turkeys by region or county.

Good example with the deer limit it's 3 a day in unit L. Virtually unlimited... But is the deer population decimated? No because most CAN'T and WONT kill that many...

One of my points is that might be the same with turkeys. It won't change much because most people CANT kill 4 anyways...

Look at quail you can kill 6 a day!!!? Think that has any matter on the population?

Something to think about..

I do not think this idea will work. I started hunting turkeys in 2010 and easily limited out on the same WMA for the first 3 seasons (I couldn't hunt in 2012 for personal reasons). I had more private land by 2014 and still easily limited out for a couple more seasons. As an FYI I didn't even know how to call turkeys, i just bushwhacked them. In 2015 I started learning more about turkeys, calling them and hunting them. It is way more fun to kill one by calling it in and just win the game. Doing so with no decoys is just icing on the cake. That being said, the WMA I used to limit out on easily, still has turkeys, but no where near what it used to have. The main reason is over killing. Most people can't kill 4 anymore no matter where they hunt, because they can't find 4 to kill, because they aren't there anymore. The folks that have healthy populations on several farms, limit out, sometimes regardless of their skill level. The folks that do not have birds anymore do not, also regardless of their skill level.

I rarely hunt deer with a firearm on WMAs anymore, but when I have I have noticed there is a influx of E. TN hunters here in Unit L killing deer, because they can't shoot does, in E. TN at that time or there just aren't as many deer. Get where this going? Making limits by county, zones or what have you will only bring people from the low limit areas to the high limit areas to hunt.

Bgoodman30":qcpz4a2t said:
I don't disagree the reduced limit may help but I fear it might be all for naught... And if the population rebounds I doubt they will raise it back... Just hate to see us lose any more freedoms in this country...

The only thing that the TWRA or TWRC can control is the # of birds we can shoot. The issue with no lowering the limit by law is that if 20% of turkey hunters self limit, and 80% do not, it will be all for naught, so it has to be an imposed limit. I mention this because eventually someone will comment, "If you guys care so much, just self limit..." Remember deer limits have gone up and down many times in the last 30 years or so. Nothing saying if they lowered it to 2 for a few years that we couldn't walk back up to 3.

Yes I agree where is this going!? States like AR reducing OOS days on WMA's for NR for ducks. States reducing limits, dates and tags for NR. TN looking to reduce limits and days we can hunt!

I rarely hunt public but the only bird I've killed this season came off a heavily pressured WMA. I know farms close by that don't get a fraction of the pressure that have far fewer birds than they used too. One of them even larger than the WMA.. Actually the only gobbler I've seen since last Tuesday was on this WMA as I was just driving by and I've hunted everyday.. So I don't believe the pressure is the underlying issue....

Next crappie fisherman will be up in arms to reduce the crappie limit because of all the turkey hunters fishing! All brought to you by turkey HUNTERS! Where is this going!? I like fishing too but I'd rather hunt!
I think your missing my point. I know there are many factors that play into the decline, but limits and season dates are really all we can control.

Either the TWRA has to open more predator trapping/hunting opportunities (perhaps with bounties) or lower hunting limits and season lengths.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm all for the TWRA predator control efforts but without fur prices I think we're in trouble... A bounty is a great idea but can TWRA afford it? Maybe coon hunting will have a resurgence one day but I doubt it...?

I agree that some limit reductions or later opening may help marginally but I think it might be a feel good strategy. I want proof from other state agencies that reducing the limit has proven to restore populations and hunter success? Most folks only kill 2 or less anyways so what changes other than punishing the avid hunters...?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
The reason for a limit reduction is not a 'punishment', but rather a statement to the hunting public that the resource is not sustainable under current management strategies. Same way with season opening dates (which are far more crucial). It sucks to have 2 weeks of season taken away if opening dates are pushed back by 2 weeks (which is what I feel is absolutely necessary to for turkeys to continue as a renewable resource), but if it allows us to have a huntable population for the rest of my lifetime, its worth it.

I've never killed 4 birds in TN in a single year since the limit was increased to 4 (easy to do, but my farms could not handle that year after year), but I'm seriously thinking about spending half of my TN time on public land and killing my 4, 'but just spreading them out across the state, so its OK'

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk
 
megalomaniac":27acocnh said:
The reason for a limit reduction is not a 'punishment', but rather a statement to the hunting public that the resource is not sustainable under current management strategies. Same way with season opening dates (which are far more crucial). It sucks to have 2 weeks of season taken away if opening dates are pushed back by 2 weeks (which is what I feel is absolutely necessary to for turkeys to continue as a renewable resource), but if it allows us to have a huntable population for the rest of my lifetime, its worth it.

I've never killed 4 birds in TN in a single year since the limit was increased to 4 (easy to do, but my farms could not handle that year after year), but I'm seriously thinking about spending half of my TN time on public land and killing my 4, 'but just spreading them out across the state, so its OK'

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk

I agree whatever works to provide the opportunities for my children will be worth it but only if it works! I am not looking for "statements" but solutions! I am afraid some of these solutions may not be economically feasible... Idk maybe fur makes a resurgence and coon pelts prices increase?

I also agree pushing the season dates back will be the most help for breeding success IMO.. I think one week would be a good start. This will also decrease those reaching the limit of 4 so again wouldn't help much..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Lower limit based upon zones to keep the Region 2 hunters happy until those areas experience what other parts of the state already have then they will understand and stop with the questioning, ban full fan decoys(possibly all decoys but from my personal experience I haven't been successful using them except for field birds on occasion), push the season back 2 weeks minimum, and no NR hunters until after 2 weeks of the season for residents.
A good place to start with a path toward success on season/limit changes would be the South Carolina Turkey Management report that was posted several months ago. Use that and what has been commented about ad nauseam to enlighten yourself and gain understanding of things like when you kill all the dominant breeders in the first 2 weeks of the season it leads to population decline because the order of dominance isn't quickly reestablished and leads to many hens being unbred. That doesn't even include all the natural hurdles that effect nesting success and poult recruitment on a yearly basis. Also take into account that there haven't been detailed surveys done in our state regarding nesting success or poult recruitment to base the asinine limits on to begin with. Why it hasn't been taken to zones the way deer hunting was years ago is just lazy on TFWC/TWRA. To say that "avid (Turkey)hunters" would feel punished by lowering the season limit speaks so loudly I can't even hear what you're saying. I think true avid turkey hunters are respectful of the resource, want to continue to be able to do what they love to do every spring for the foreseeable future, and would completely understand that lowering limits to achieve that(along with other changes) is the right thing to do.
 
megalomaniac":2j04zrw4 said:
The reason for a limit reduction is not a 'punishment', but rather a statement to the hunting public that the resource is not sustainable under current management strategies.
Same way with season opening dates (which are far more crucial).
Exactly right.

Those stating "I only kill my 4 birds across several farms, spread them out," are only kidding themselves, or rationalizing.

Turkeys have a larger "range" than many people want to accept.

For every accomplished hunter making the "spread out the kills" statement,
there's another one much like him, both unbeknownst to each other, both limiting out on the same area's turkey populations,
Often, it's several hunters in an area doing this, not just one or two who don't know about each other.

From a practical standpoint, TWRA must do something "practical" and reasonably "enforceable".

Just to "keep it simple" . . . . .

Best thing TWRA could do is start opening our turkey season on the 2nd Saturday of April
and go to a 2-bird limit.


This change would insure our turkey season never opens any earlier than April 8th,
and would "on average" mean our turkey season opens about 10 days later in the future
than it has for the past few decades (of Saturday closest to April 1st, which was often in March).
 
prstide":3eouib8x said:
Lower limit based upon zones to keep the Region 2 hunters happy until those areas experience what other parts of the state already have then they will understand and stop with the questioning, ban full fan decoys(possibly all decoys but from my personal experience I haven't been successful using them except for field birds on occasion), push the season back 2 weeks minimum, and no NR hunters until after 2 weeks of the season for residents.
A good place to start with a path toward success on season/limit changes would be the South Carolina Turkey Management report that was posted several months ago. Use that and what has been commented about ad nauseam to enlighten yourself and gain understanding of things like when you kill all the dominant breeders in the first 2 weeks of the season it leads to population decline because the order of dominance isn't quickly reestablished and leads to many hens being unbred. That doesn't even include all the natural hurdles that effect nesting success and poult recruitment on a yearly basis. Also take into account that there haven't been detailed surveys done in our state regarding nesting success or poult recruitment to base the asinine limits on to begin with. Why it hasn't been taken to zones the way deer hunting was years ago is just lazy on TFWC/TWRA. To say that "avid (Turkey)hunters" would feel punished by lowering the season limit speaks so loudly I can't even hear what you're saying. I think true avid turkey hunters are respectful of the resource, want to continue to be able to do what they love to do every spring for the foreseeable future, and would completely understand that lowering limits to achieve that(along with other changes) is the right thing to do.

Yeah I'm an avid hunter I like to hunt I want to have a spring season last longer than a few days. No apologies for that! I spread my kills out over several farms and public. Usually 3- 4 counties!Yes I'm very respectful of the resource there are plenty more turkeys when I leave... I own a farm under the WHIP and took up trapping this season.. I am more concerned with poults and nest success because I believe that is the answer not limits... Take Maury county for example it's usually in the top for harvest with many dominant birds taken during youth and first couple weeks of season but continues to reload! It's really the only county I hunt that I feel only has a slight decline..

Pushing season back and switch to zone/ region limits is what I support even though I don't believe any limit reductions will bring populations back... Limit reductions would naturally happen and would not really by necessary imo. Also would also see support the fan ban. I have used it successfully in the past a few times but have left it in the truck this season...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
prstide":2bm66ylv said:
Lower limit based upon zones to keep the Region 2 hunters happy until those areas experience what other parts of the state already have then they will understand and stop with the questioning, ban full fan decoys(possibly all decoys but from my personal experience I haven't been successful using them except for field birds on occasion), push the season back 2 weeks minimum, and no NR hunters until after 2 weeks of the season for residents.
A good place to start with a path toward success on season/limit changes would be the South Carolina Turkey Management report that was posted several months ago. Use that and what has been commented about ad nauseam to enlighten yourself and gain understanding of things like when you kill all the dominant breeders in the first 2 weeks of the season it leads to population decline because the order of dominance isn't quickly reestablished and leads to many hens being unbred. That doesn't even include all the natural hurdles that effect nesting success and poult recruitment on a yearly basis. Also take into account that there haven't been detailed surveys done in our state regarding nesting success or poult recruitment to base the asinine limits on to begin with. Why it hasn't been taken to zones the way deer hunting was years ago is just lazy on TFWC/TWRA. To say that "avid (Turkey)hunters" would feel punished by lowering the season limit speaks so loudly I can't even hear what you're saying. I think true avid turkey hunters are respectful of the resource, want to continue to be able to do what they love to do every spring for the foreseeable future, and would completely understand that lowering limits to achieve that(along with other changes) is the right thing to do.
I love all of this! Except you are not keeping me off my farms I pay taxes on even though I am a nonresident :)

Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk
 
TheLBLman":2hn3eeii said:
megalomaniac":2hn3eeii said:
The reason for a limit reduction is not a 'punishment', but rather a statement to the hunting public that the resource is not sustainable under current management strategies.
Same way with season opening dates (which are far more crucial).
Exactly right.

Those stating "I only kill my 4 birds across several farms, spread them out," are only kidding themselves, or rationalizing.

Turkeys have a larger "range" than many people want to accept.

For every accomplished hunter making the "spread out the kills" statement,
there's another one much like him, both unbeknownst to each other, both limiting out on the same area's turkey populations,
Often, it's several hunters in an area doing this, not just one or two who don't know about each other.

From a practical standpoint, TWRA must do something "practical" and reasonably "enforceable".

Just to "keep it simple" . . . . .

Best thing TWRA could do is start opening our turkey season on the 2nd Saturday of April
and go to a 2-bird limit.


This change would insure our turkey season never opens any earlier than April 8th,
and would "on average" mean our turkey season opens about 10 days later in the future
than it has for the past few decades (of Saturday closest to April 1st, which was often in March).

I know turkeys have a huge range in the fall/winter but in my observation during spring season they usually stay pretty tight..

Your spread out kills statement between other hunters makes perfect sense but probably again marginal because so few hunters actually reach the limit.. On my private farms it seems most turkeys we don't kill survive which I certainly can't say that about our deer...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Also would like TN to go to paper tags for purchase like in many states. Your BG license gets you 2 tags and additional tags must be purchased separately. Extra dollars from tag sales go directly to turkey conservation efforts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

Latest posts

Back
Top