Proposal to Allow Handguns During Muzzleloader Season

Tennessee Deer Sporting & Deer Hunting Community Forum

Help Support TNDeer | Tennessee Deer:

contendershooter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
202
City & State/Province
TN, USA
I am doing a second hunter survey to see if this idea would be acceptable, to allow the use of handguns during muzzleloader season. The argument of making it a full fledged rifle season seems to have some saying the woods would flood with deer, but I highly doubt that could be said for just allowing the use of handguns during muzzleloader season. This would place us closer to being on par with Mississippi, Missouri, Indiana, South Carolina and others...

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5792QF6
 
Why do you want to be on par with other states?? You can buy a license and hunt there now! I see NO reason to add Handguns to our MZ season, simply NO need for it!
 
Deer Assassin":1skfl9v9 said:
one season any weapon

The only problem with this is that the limits would have to drop to offset the ease with which hunters would now have to kill deer. Especially rifle hunters shooting deer in September in bean fields. Or the season would have to be shortened. Either way we'd have to give up something to keep harvest numbers about the same. Not that this couldn't be done.

My biggest problem with this personally would be having to chose between letting my neighbors get a head start by hunting deer with 270's across big bean fields in the late Summer heat, or waiting for the 1st frost, when I could enjoy the hunting, but half the good bucks would already be dead.
 
I can see a justification for allowing handguns an early start if weapon effectiveness is taken into account. You'd have to change the name of the season though. Not sure what you'd call it. "Inferior Weapon season"???? The only problem I see with handguns is that you have handguns and then you have handguns. :) A Ruger Blackhawk in 44 Special with open sights is a whole different ballgame from a Contender chambered to the 30 Herrett with a scope on top rested on a tripod inside a blind. I suppose that would be no more effective than a modern ML but then see my response to the other thread where I'm in favor of doing away with a separate ML season entirely.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
You can carry and hunt with a handgun now during muzzle-loader season. So long as its a muzzle-loading pistol or muzzle-loading Revolver. :super:
 
PillsburyDoughboy":2608vdsp said:
You can carry and hunt with a handgun now during muzzle-loader season. So long as its a muzzle-loading pistol or muzzle-loading Revolver. :super:


That's what I was thinking as I read down through the posts.... Also same argument that gets brought up every year wanting shotguns in ML seasons... This time it just happens to be handguns that are being requested. I understand that "most" handguns do not have the effective range of a shotgun especially when you put a rifled barrel on it, but I'm still against it.
 
Bone Collector":30t02v7w said:
PillsburyDoughboy":30t02v7w said:
You can carry and hunt with a handgun now during muzzle-loader season. So long as its a muzzle-loading pistol or muzzle-loading Revolver. :super:


That's what I was thinking as I read down through the posts.... Also same argument that gets brought up every year wanting shotguns in ML seasons... This time it just happens to be handguns that are being requested. I understand that "most" handguns do not have the effective range of a shotgun especially when you put a rifled barrel on it, but I'm still against it.
You could get a TC Encore in 30-06/ 270 and with a proper rest and scope darn near reach out to 200-300 yards if you know what your doing. But yeah I get the "most" part. Also "most" people don't know how to manage a hunting handgun properly with a scope. It takes a really steady rest to achieve long range results. Most peoples though is to put on a 4x or 6x scope and that is some pretty high magnification for a pistol.
 
contendershooter":1puc6rkq said:
I am doing a second hunter survey to see if this idea would be acceptable, to allow the use of handguns during muzzleloader season. The argument of making it a full fledged rifle season seems to have some saying the woods would flood with deer, but I highly doubt that could be said for just allowing the use of handguns during muzzleloader season. This would place us closer to being on par with Mississippi, Missouri, Indiana, South Carolina and others...

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5792QF6
I thought in your other survey you were wanting to do away with muzzle loader season,and just have archery and gun :stir:
 
Unnecessary as pistols are legal during gun season now. Moving it up 2 weeks would just cause unnecessary complications for enforcement without creating any new opportunities for hunters.
 
Hunter 257W":1jzl9k3m said:
I can see a justification for allowing handguns an early start if weapon effectiveness is taken into account. You'd have to change the name of the season though. Not sure what you'd call it. "Inferior Weapon season"???? The only problem I see with handguns is that you have handguns and then you have handguns. :) A Ruger Blackhawk in 44 Special with open sights is a whole different ballgame from a Contender chambered to the 30 Herrett with a scope on top rested on a tripod inside a blind. I suppose that would be no more effective than a modern ML but then see my response to the other thread where I'm in favor of doing away with a separate ML season entirely.

I agree and other states called it a "primitative weapons or limited range weapons season" Typically it includes the ability of using"

single shot shotguns

single shot handguns firing traditional pistol cartridges

single shot rifles firing traditional pistol cartridges or rifle cartridges .35 caliber and above that are straight walled

I have proposed this five times over 7 years and it got nowhere
 
Ken45":3vmhptvf said:
contendershooter":3vmhptvf said:
I am doing a second hunter survey to see if this idea would be acceptable, to allow the use of handguns during muzzleloader season. The argument of making it a full fledged rifle season seems to have some saying the woods would flood with deer, but I highly doubt that could be said for just allowing the use of handguns during muzzleloader season. This would place us closer to being on par with Mississippi, Missouri, Indiana, South Carolina and others...

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5792QF6
I thought in your other survey you were wanting to do away with muzzle loader season,and just have archery and gun :stir:

That is true, but I have heard this as a proposal before and I have proposed this so I am just getting an opinion
 
pb10point":1t477q0s said:
Do not see the need for this.I think you should leave setting the seasons up to TWRA.They look at the big picture not just what best suites one person.

tell that to all the hunters whom wanted to keep three bucks per year
 
[quoteI have proposed this five times over 7 years and it got nowhere][/quote]
With any luck #8 and so forth will get you same results!
 
It's nice to see everyone is following the rules of the board...Can't believe just a simple survey and discussion gets into so much bashing...
 
contendershooter":2up6igqh said:
Hunter 257W":2up6igqh said:
I can see a justification for allowing handguns an early start if weapon effectiveness is taken into account. You'd have to change the name of the season though. Not sure what you'd call it. "Inferior Weapon season"???? The only problem I see with handguns is that you have handguns and then you have handguns. :) A Ruger Blackhawk in 44 Special with open sights is a whole different ballgame from a Contender chambered to the 30 Herrett with a scope on top rested on a tripod inside a blind. I suppose that would be no more effective than a modern ML but then see my response to the other thread where I'm in favor of doing away with a separate ML season entirely.

I agree and other states called it a "primitative weapons or limited range weapons season" Typically it includes the ability of using"

single shot shotguns

single shot handguns firing traditional pistol cartridges

single shot rifles firing traditional pistol cartridges or rifle cartridges .35 caliber and above that are straight walled

I have proposed this five times over 7 years and it got nowhere


Then why do you keep doing it?? Obviously its not wanted.
 
contendershooter":2txwhrr4 said:
Hunter 257W":2txwhrr4 said:
I can see a justification for allowing handguns an early start if weapon effectiveness is taken into account. You'd have to change the name of the season though. Not sure what you'd call it. "Inferior Weapon season"???? The only problem I see with handguns is that you have handguns and then you have handguns. :) A Ruger Blackhawk in 44 Special with open sights is a whole different ballgame from a Contender chambered to the 30 Herrett with a scope on top rested on a tripod inside a blind. I suppose that would be no more effective than a modern ML but then see my response to the other thread where I'm in favor of doing away with a separate ML season entirely.



I have proposed this five times over 7 years and it got nowhere
So what does that tell you?
 
I would be for some type of handgun season if the handgun was chambered in a pistol round. There are states that do this. But against messing with muzzleloader season.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top