I think Indiana should be out if they lose to Ohio St.
If the loser of the SECCG has 3 losses are they out?
We've been discussing this a lot in my little group ... I think the only way that's "fair" (funny word to use in this situation) is to disregard the championship game for the loser. ie a 10-2 team that loses its championship is looked at as if it were 10-2, not 10-3. Otherwise they're going to find themselves in situations where teams don't want to play for their conference championship and risk getting knocked out of the playoffs.If the loser of the SECCG has 3 losses are they out?
I'm leaning this way as well. Ignore the championship game for the loser and rank them based on their regular season record.We've been discussing this a lot in my little group ... I think the only way that's "fair" (funny word to use in this situation) is to disregard the championship game for the loser. ie a 10-2 team that loses its championship is looked at as if it were 10-2, not 10-3. Otherwise they're going to find themselves in situations where teams don't want to play for their conference championship and risk getting knocked out of the playoffs.
I agree these games should remain. I just don't think you can punish the runner up for losing that game if you are getting multiple conference teams in the playoffsI'm looking at the future a little differently regarding championship games. I think every conference should have one, after all, the name of the game is more games equals more money right? For the NCAA that is.
Nobody wanted to hear that. I said it at the beginning of the season. https://www.tndeer.com/threads/florida-st-vs-gt.456570/page-2#post-5966438I said several weeks ago that there is a good chance of a 3-loss team in the playoffs.
Kiffin doesn't want to play in it because he knows what will happen.
Texas is the only SEC program with one loss this season, while five others — Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Texas A&M and Kiffin's Rebels — have two each. Imagine if Texas A&M defeats Texas next weekend and every other program wins out, and you've got the makings of Kiffin's proposed crisis: Play in Atlanta at your own risk
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2024/11/19/sec-championship-game-college-football-playoff/
I've talked to other coaches, so I'll just kind of give you the feeling from some other coaches that, you know, they don't want to be in it," Kiffin said Monday during his weekly news conference. "You know, the reward to get a bye [in the CFP] versus the risk to get knocked out completely, I mean, that's a really big risk just to get a bye.
He's right.Kiffin's quote from the article:
There's zero benefit to playing in the SEC championship game. Bragging about a conference championship vs losing your spot in the CFP.
There's zero benefit to playing in the SEC championship game. Bragging about a conference championship vs losing your spot in the CFP.
I don't think anyone's saying that the SEC Championship loser should automatically get it ... just that the loss shouldn't count against them. In your scenario a randomly selected Texas A&M (currently ranked 15) goes to Atlanta and loses...they'd stay number 15 and still wouldn't be in the playoffs. Now look at this scenario: your #11 Vols are selected to go to Atlanta and lose. Should they fall to 13+ and out of the playoffs, or should they keep their #11 playoff spot?Exactly. The problem with the argument that the loser shouldn't be penalized loses steam when you factor that the teams playing in it could come down to drawing straws.
How awesome would that be? The ADs of the teams gathered around drawing. That would be TV gold.
And, I'm sure everyone would be fine if A&M is the losing team in the championship game and them going while knocking your team out.
Kiffin's quote from the article:
There's zero benefit to playing in the SEC championship game. Bragging about a conference championship vs losing your spot in the CFP.
Texas don't have a quality win,Vandy is their best winSo Arkansas is a notable win for Texas, but a bad loss for Tennessee?