BSK
Well-Known Member
I often write and talk about why it's so important to collect detailed hunter observation data. Human perception is too flawed to produce meaningful comparisons between years regarding hunter effort versus deer seen. This year on my property is a prime example. If you talk to the hunters who hunt the property, this has been a terrible year. No rutting activity was observed by hunters at all. Not the first pestering or tending chase has been observed. Two of the three hard-core hunters of the property are still buckless.
Yet looking at collected observation data, this year hasn't been that bad at all. The deer observation rate (deer observed by hunters per hunting hour) this year is only 17% below average. The buck observation rate has been exactly average. The observation rate of older (2 1/2+ year-old) bucks has been 37% above average, and the observation rate of 3 1/2+ bucks has been 51% above average.
Just one more example of how human perceptions can get in the way of the truth.
Yet looking at collected observation data, this year hasn't been that bad at all. The deer observation rate (deer observed by hunters per hunting hour) this year is only 17% below average. The buck observation rate has been exactly average. The observation rate of older (2 1/2+ year-old) bucks has been 37% above average, and the observation rate of 3 1/2+ bucks has been 51% above average.
Just one more example of how human perceptions can get in the way of the truth.