Longhunter said:I own and hunt with several single shot rifles. The New England / H&R Handi-Rifles I own are all very accurate and dependable. They are simple to operate and that is a big advantage for a child.
One thing I do not understand is why more people do not start kids off with rifles that shoot pistol cartridges. The Handi-Rifle is available in 44mag/44spl and either of those cartridges are DEADLY on deer at 100 yards or less. The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
My little girl is eight years old and she can shoot my Winchester 94 Trapper in 45 Colt very well. I have taken several deer with the 45 Colt, one with a 44 mag, and and one with a 44spl. While these deer were taken with pistols instead of rifles all but one dropped in its tracks! The longer barrel of the rifle would allow for even more velocity and energy.
Give a rifle chambered for a pistol cartridge a try. You and your child will not be disappointed.
Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Longhunter said:I own and hunt with several single shot rifles. The New England / H&R Handi-Rifles I own are all very accurate and dependable. They are simple to operate and that is a big advantage for a child.
One thing I do not understand is why more people do not start kids off with rifles that shoot pistol cartridges. The Handi-Rifle is available in 44mag/44spl and either of those cartridges are DEADLY on deer at 100 yards or less. The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
My little girl is eight years old and she can shoot my Winchester 94 Trapper in 45 Colt very well. I have taken several deer with the 45 Colt, one with a 44 mag, and and one with a 44spl. While these deer were taken with pistols instead of rifles all but one dropped in its tracks! The longer barrel of the rifle would allow for even more velocity and energy.
Give a rifle chambered for a pistol cartridge a try. You and your child will not be disappointed.
Hogbear said:Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Nope. A rifle in .44 mag will have more recoil than the same weight gun in .30-30.
Koyodiak said:Hogbear said:Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Nope. A rifle in .44 mag will have more recoil than the same weight gun in .30-30.
Are you sure about that?
Hogbear said:Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Nope. A rifle in .44 mag will have more recoil than the same weight gun in .30-30.
Kimberman said:Hogbear said:Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Nope. A rifle in .44 mag will have more recoil than the same weight gun in .30-30.
I don't think so, I have shot a Ruger 44 carbine and a Marlin 1894 in 44 Mag, they recoiled less than any 30-30 I have shot.
Hogbear said:Koyodiak said:Hogbear said:Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Nope. A rifle in .44 mag will have more recoil than the same weight gun in .30-30.
Are you sure about that?
They'e pretty close, but most .30-30 loads are a little less recoil than 240 gr .44 mag loads. Here's a table of some recoils. It's not the best comparison of many calibers because they use so many different rifle weights. The .44 mag 240 gr and .30-30 150 grain both use 7.5 lb rifle though, and the .223 uses a lighter 7.0 lb rifle.
.44 Rem. Mag. (240 at 1760) 7.5 11.2
.44 Rem. Mag. (275 at 1580) 7.5 11.4
.30-30 Win. (150 at 2400) 7.5 10.6
.30-30 Win. (160 at 2400) 7.5 12.7
.30-30 Win. (170 at 2200) 7.5 11.0
.243 Win. (100 at 2960) 7.5 8.8
.357 Mag. (158 at 1650) 7.0 4.7
.223 Rem. (62 at 3025) 7.0 3.9
http://www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm
http://forum.gon.com/showthread.php?t=56996
You can use various ballistics calculators and they say pretty much the same thing.
Koyodiak said:Hogbear said:Koyodiak said:Hogbear said:Longhunter said:The pistol cartridges will not recoil or produce near the muzzle blast that even a mild rifle cartridge produces.
Nope. A rifle in .44 mag will have more recoil than the same weight gun in .30-30.
Are you sure about that?
They'e pretty close, but most .30-30 loads are a little less recoil than 240 gr .44 mag loads. Here's a table of some recoils. It's not the best comparison of many calibers because they use so many different rifle weights. The .44 mag 240 gr and .30-30 150 grain both use 7.5 lb rifle though, and the .223 uses a lighter 7.0 lb rifle.
.44 Rem. Mag. (240 at 1760) 7.5 11.2
.44 Rem. Mag. (275 at 1580) 7.5 11.4
.30-30 Win. (150 at 2400) 7.5 10.6
.30-30 Win. (160 at 2400) 7.5 12.7
.30-30 Win. (170 at 2200) 7.5 11.0
.243 Win. (100 at 2960) 7.5 8.8
.357 Mag. (158 at 1650) 7.0 4.7
.223 Rem. (62 at 3025) 7.0 3.9
http://www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm
http://forum.gon.com/showthread.php?t=56996
You can use various ballistics calculators and they say pretty much the same thing.
I'll buy that, Thanks.